Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.3.0 release planning #38

Closed
14 tasks done
pnorman opened this issue Jul 31, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed
14 tasks done

0.3.0 release planning #38

pnorman opened this issue Jul 31, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@pnorman
Copy link
Contributor

pnorman commented Jul 31, 2013

The plan for 0.3.0 is to include the single-element and multi-element get calls

Targeted for 0.3.0 release

  • /node/# tested
  • /way/# tested
  • /relation/# tested
  • /nodes?nodes=... tested
  • /ways?ways=... tested
  • /relations?relations=... tested

Moved out of --enable-experimental

  • /node/#
  • /way/#
  • /relation/#
  • /nodes?nodes=...
  • /ways?ways=...
  • /relations?relations=...

Decide on

@pnorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

pnorman commented Jul 31, 2013

Per irc conversations, we're okay responding with 405 to non-GET requests, although the error message needs fixing (no longer specific to map requests) and should probably be specific to HEAD requests so you get a different error message if cgimap gets a PUT request which is part of the API vs a HEAD which isn't a documented part.

@zerebubuth
Copy link
Owner

I've started adding these to milestone 0.3.0. I'm not sure as I've not used Github's milestone support before, but managing them that way might be easier?

@pnorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

pnorman commented Aug 1, 2013

well, I don't have the access required to create a milestone, so that ruled it out for me

@pnorman
Copy link
Contributor Author

pnorman commented Sep 18, 2013

The only issue remaining for 0.3.0 that I'm aware of is #39, which is about Content-Disposition. As it's driven by a website UI question, I've raised it in openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#479 but it hasn't yet attracted any comment

@zerebubuth
Copy link
Owner

#39 is fixed by #79, so I'm going to tag 0.3.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants