Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a General Purpose 'MetadataValidator' to the Slice Parser #3067
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add a General Purpose 'MetadataValidator' to the Slice Parser #3067
Changes from 6 commits
8e68d5d
8e5d579
b850eef
1caf671
7fecd38
e153196
431e143
fce08e3
aa342d3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like you're incrementing the iterator twice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. Fixed.
My fingers are too used to typing the
++i
in the for loop...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This works because MetadaList is a
std::list
and not astd::vector
.Since you are using an iterator, you should remove this element using this iterator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks a lot like the logic we have for dispatching operations: we receive an operation name ("op") and we need to select the correct handler that unmarshals the parameters and more. It would make sense to use the same "dispatch" logic. See for example:
ice/cpp/src/Ice/Object.cpp
Line 103 in 40171af
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The operation dispatch logic is definitely more performant than my code,
but I also think it's much more complicated to follow, and there's more places for things to go wrong (we need to keep indices, the list, and it's length in sync)...
So, personally I'd prefer to keep the simpler logic I have here, since the Slice compiler's performance is a secondary concern.