-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Main bc owl mainnet 3 #1478
Main bc owl mainnet 3 #1478
Conversation
now if the todo_name function panics, it will be in a more informative place.
removed chain argument from transaction_request_from_send_inputs and associated functions. there are expectations to fix here
$cargo nextest run lr_shield_hot --no-capture --run-ignored only Compiling zingolib v0.2.0 (/home/cupress/ZINGO/libs/main_bc_owl_mainnet/zingolib) Compiling darkside-tests v0.1.0 (/home/cupress/ZINGO/libs/main_bc_owl_mainnet/darkside-tests) Compiling zingo-cli v0.2.0 (/home/cupress/ZINGO/libs/main_bc_owl_mainnet/zingocli) Compiling libtonode-tests v0.2.0 (/home/cupress/ZINGO/libs/main_bc_owl_mainnet/libtonode-tests) Finished `test` profile [optimized] target(s) in 38.13s ------------ Nextest run ID d27d20f6-3a6d-4c9e-bd22-f403376c08aa with nextest profile: default Starting 1 test across 18 binaries (344 tests skipped) START zingolib lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::mainnet_hhcclaltpcckcsslpcnetblr_shield_hot running 1 test **Batch** Current: 2 Total: 13 **Blocks** Current Height: 2665069 **Batch** Current: 5 Total: 13 **Blocks** Current Height: 2665369 **Batch** Current: 9 Total: 13 **Blocks** Current Height: 2665769 **Batch** Current: 12 Total: 13 **Blocks** Current Height: 2666010 PoolBalances { sapling_balance: Some(0), verified_sapling_balance: Some(0), spendable_sapling_balance: Some(0), unverified_sapling_balance: Some(0), orchard_balance: Some(635000), verified_orchard_balance: Some(635000), unverified_orchard_balance: Some(0), spendable_orchard_balance : Some(635000), transparent_balance: Some(100000) } mainnet_hhcclaltpcckcsslpcnetblr has 21 transactions in it SLOW [> 60.000s] zingolib lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::mainnet_hhcclaltpcckcsslpcnetblr_shield_hot test lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::mainnet_hhcclaltpcckcsslpcnetblr_shield_hot has been running for over 60 seconds SLOW [>120.000s] zingolib lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::mainnet_hhcclaltpcckcsslpcnetblr_shield_hot test lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::mainnet_hhcclaltpcckcsslpcnetblr_shield_hot ... ok test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 213 filtered out; finished in 168.26s PASS [ 168.265s] zingolib lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::mainnet_hhcclaltpcckcsslpcnetblr_shield_hot ------------ Summary [ 168.265s] 1 test run: 1 passed (1 slow), 344 skipped 1727809469 || mbompp_fix_shield[ ] cb3c83e so shielding works on dev in the single-address case $cargo nextest run pr_shield_hot --no-capture --run-ignored only Finished `test` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.14s ------------ Nextest run ID 914799ea-9e23-423e-b4d1-a44d97884768 with nextest profile: default Starting 1 test across 18 binaries (344 tests skipped) START zingolib lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot running 1 test **Batch** Current: 8 Total: 17 **Blocks** Current Height: 3000848 **Batch** Current: 16 Total: 17 **Blocks** Current Height: 3001600 PoolBalances { sapling_balance: Some(0), verified_sapling_balance: Some(0), spendable_sapling_balance: Some(0), unverified_sapling_balance: Some(0), orchard_balance: Some(2022), verified_orchard_balance: Some(2022), unverified_orchard_balance: Some(0 ), spendable_orchard_balance: Some(2022), transparent_balance: Some(2212000) } thread 'lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot' panicked at zingolib/src/testutils/chain_generics/with_assertions.rs:172:6: record is ok: Mismatch(Transmitted(BlockHeight(3001601)), Transmitted(BlockHeight(3001601)), Err(FeeUnderflow { input_value: 2212000, explicit_output_value: 5441000 }), 1195000) stack backtrace: 0: rust_begin_unwind 1: core::panicking::panic_fmt 2: core::result::unwrap_failed 3: zingolib::testutils::chain_generics::with_assertions::propose_shield_bump_sync::{{closure}} 4: zingolib::lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot::{{closure}} 5: tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::Context::enter 6: tokio::runtime::context::scoped::Scoped<T>::set 7: tokio::runtime::scheduler::current_thread::CoreGuard::block_on 8: tokio::runtime::context::runtime::enter_runtime 9: tokio::runtime::runtime::Runtime::block_on 10: zingolib::lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot 11: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace. test lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot ... FAILED failures: failures: lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot test result: FAILED. 0 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 213 filtered out; finished in 9.94s FAIL [ 9.942s] zingolib lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot ------------ Summary [ 9.942s] 1 test run: 0 passed, 1 failed, 344 skipped FAIL [ 9.942s] zingolib lightclient::send::send_with_proposal::test::testnet_cbbhrwiilgbrababsshsmtpr_shield_hot error: test run failed 1727800954 || main_bc_owl_mainnet_plus_provider[ ] c58987fbb
5a5858c
to
5457fbc
Compare
41d43d7
to
e55bb50
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please change from initial letter on each token of the seed phrase to the initial tokens in the seed.. maybe 2 or 3.
Please use the default import syntax that code actions enforce on files.
not within the scope of this PR |
Yeah, I am fine with these issues being addressed in another PR. That could be a cleaner flow. |
860958a
to
3063d33
Compare
test only PR