Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Code Signing lints for EKU, Key Usage, RSA Key Size and CRLDistributionPoints #865
Add Code Signing lints for EKU, Key Usage, RSA Key Size and CRLDistributionPoints #865
Changes from 4 commits
feb35ad
c8a379e
bf12818
923489a
59cb9fa
8ae256d
f79e81d
5b0fdea
23c29ba
bd3e6b8
083a019
c3e7540
3cc9fc1
54e5c90
7e7288a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the preamble to the document...
...I believe that we can safely add the following assumption to base.go.
Additionally, I am somewhat indecisive about the
IsSubscriber
clause that we have attached to these specific lints. It's unfortunate, but the document seems to have a mix of explicitly stating when a set of requirements is target specifically subscriber certs as well as implicit. That is, lints such as these seem like they would naturally apply to subscriber certs, but it's not explicitly spelled out like I am seeing in some other sections...unless I am simply not seeing it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at the CABF CS BR 7.1.2, these lints are targeted at the Subscriber Certificate profile, there is some overlap with the Sub CA profile, not so much with the root CA profile.
So we could remove the IsSubscriber check, I would need to update the lints to accommodate the other profiles. But we should keep the IsSubscriber for the key_usage check, since it's basically opposite to the CAs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would you mind splitting this branch into two so that the returned error message has no ambiguities? Doing so helps reduce the time an operator has to spend figuring which is actually the issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.