-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review of Zowe code backups #178
Comments
Do we have particular examples of the extended/optional code in mind? Is like the |
I would think we need to do an inventory first of what we have. (I had not
even thought about website.) What I have heard is "Zowe Releases" are
backed up ...but code not in "core" is not and that triggered by
question..
Github?
Website?
Doc?
Samples?
Build/test (Marist) - not incremental but "could" do a snapshot backup for
point in time disaster recovery
Automated Test cases?
What does CII require?
Item is to think about - know the gaps and decide if gaps need filled and
how......
Bruce Armstrong
IBM System Z Offering Manager- zowe.org
4205 S MIAMI BLVD, DURHAM NC 27703-9141
Email: armstrob@us.ibm.com
Tel: 919-254-8773
Cell: 919-931-3132
From: Mark Ackert <notifications@github.com>
To: zowe/zlc <zlc@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Bruce Armstrong <armstrob@us.ibm.com>, Author
<author@noreply.github.com>
Date: 04/22/2020 09:33 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [zowe/zlc] Review of Zowe code backups
(#178)
Do we have particular examples of the extended/optional code in mind? Is
like the community repository, conformance guidelines, etc? Website,
docs-site, other code materials not related to Zowe PAX or CLI Archive?
All of the above 😄?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
Drafted our backup coverage here: https://github.com/zowe/zlc/blob/user/markackert/code-backups/tracking/Backups.md |
Github recently did an archive and their explanation reveals that there are groups that backup github, so in effect there are multiple layers of protection on code that exists in github. https://archiveprogram.github.com/ |
In an internal meeting we briefly discussed the state of backup with github and learned releases are backed up but other extended/optional" code is not necessarily backed up - would we agree we need to have someone review the backup practices and make recommendations.
We know Marist agreement does not entitle the project to backups but they might accommodate snapshot backup of key environment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: