Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review of Zowe code backups #178

Closed
armstro opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Review of Zowe code backups #178

armstro opened this issue Apr 22, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@armstro
Copy link
Contributor

armstro commented Apr 22, 2020

In an internal meeting we briefly discussed the state of backup with github and learned releases are backed up but other extended/optional" code is not necessarily backed up - would we agree we need to have someone review the backup practices and make recommendations.

We know Marist agreement does not entitle the project to backups but they might accommodate snapshot backup of key environment.

@MarkAckert
Copy link
Member

Do we have particular examples of the extended/optional code in mind? Is like the community repository, conformance guidelines, etc? Website, docs-site, other code materials not related to Zowe PAX or CLI Archive? All of the above 😄?

@MarkAckert MarkAckert self-assigned this Apr 22, 2020
@armstro
Copy link
Contributor Author

armstro commented Apr 22, 2020 via email

@MarkAckert
Copy link
Member

@1000TurquoisePogs
Copy link
Member

Github recently did an archive and their explanation reveals that there are groups that backup github, so in effect there are multiple layers of protection on code that exists in github. https://archiveprogram.github.com/
By tagging the releases (we do), releases can be recreated from a github backup as long as the instructions are also present.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants