feat: 'Copy Relative Path' for USS, 'Copy Name' for DS & Jobs

[traeok]

Proposed changes

Implements three features:

• "Copy Relative Path" for USS files and directories
  • "relative" meaning relative to the search filter that's been set on the profile node. For example, if the full path for a file is /z/testUser/file.txt and the search filter is set to /z/testUser, it will return "file.txt"
• "Copy Name" for DS, PDS, PDS members and migrated DS
  • PDS members will return the format SOME.PDS(MEMNAME)
• "Copy Name" for jobs and spool files
  • Currently this just returns the label of the node, we can enhance this in the future if needed. Most of the interest was expressed for USS and DS

Release Notes

Milestone: 2.17.0

Changelog:

• Added a "Copy Relative Path" context option for USS files and directories in the tree view. #2908
• Added a "Copy Name" context option for data sets, jobs and spool files in the tree view. #2908

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to Zowe Explorer?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Updates to Documentation or Tests (if none of the other choices apply)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This checklist will be used as reference for both the contributor and the reviewer

• I have read the CONTRIBUTOR GUIDANCE wiki
• PR title follows Conventional Commits Guidelines
• PR Description is included
• gif or screenshot is included if visual changes are made
• yarn workspace vscode-extension-for-zowe vscode:prepublish has been executed
• All checks have passed (DCO, Jenkins and Code Coverage)
• I have added unit test and it is passing
• I have added integration test and it is passing
• There is coverage for the code that I have added
• I have tested it manually and there are no regressions found

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.48%. Comparing base (7995b02) to head (23e66bc).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2908      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.46%   93.48%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         104      104              
  Lines       10841    10869      +28     
  Branches     2361     2264      -97     
==========================================
+ Hits        10133    10161      +28     
  Misses        707      707              
  Partials        1        1              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[anaxceron]

Looks good, thanks @traeok

[zFernand0]

Love the enhancement! 🙏🏽
Curious if we can limit the Job label to just the Jobname(Jobid) (instead of the name(id) - SYSTEM | ACTIVE [ - CC ]) 😅

I'm still approving because I agree that this can be enhanced in the future 😋

LGTM! 😋

[traeok]

Love the enhancement! 🙏🏽 Curious if we can limit the Job label to just the Jobname(Jobid) (instead of the name(id) - SYSTEM | ACTIVE [ - CC ]) 😅

Thanks for the suggestion! I've pushed up commit 23e66bc that will return that format for jobs with valid job objects 😋

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
1.4% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[zFernand0]

LGTM! 😋

---

Thanks for addressing the feedback so quickly! 🥳

For spool-files, I don't think people will need the job name or id to be there as prefix 😋
I think just having JES:JESMSGLG is probably more than enough 😋

[t1m0thyj]

LGTM, thanks @traeok!