-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restructure storage kvstore directory #13307
Conversation
This PR cannot be merged due to conflicts. Please rebase to resolve them. |
2b302ee
to
676633d
Compare
676633d
to
6dfdd82
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
...ct_access_devicekey/tests/TESTS/direct_access_devicekey/direct_access_devicekey_tdb/main.cpp
Show resolved
Hide resolved
6dfdd82
to
8fc628e
Compare
8fc628e
to
d956116
Compare
@0xc0170 Could you please start CI... |
CI started |
CI restarted |
Test run: FAILEDSummary: 1 of 6 test jobs failed Failed test jobs:
|
@rajkan01 Can you review failures in dynamic memory?
They look related to the changes. |
@0xc0170 As part of new storage/kvstore directory restructure, we added mbed_lib.json at kvstore root directory with config "kvstore" to prevent build tools includes kvstore source by default. |
To prevent breaking changes to applications, instead of introducing a new library name like |
@evedon Yes I will re-use |
25cc6f8
to
ca84e11
Compare
@0xc0170 mbed-bootloader issue resolved by re-using existing library name |
CI restarted |
Test run: SUCCESSSummary: 6 of 6 test jobs passed |
@0xc0170 CI passed, Could you review and merge |
Summary of changes
Preceding PR: #13300
Restructured
storage/kvstore
as per the new directory structure proposal:Impact of changes
None.
Migration actions required
None.
Documentation
To Be Updated.
Pull request type
Test results
Manual testing: (Build for K64F target with GCC_ARM toolchain)
Reviewers
@0xc0170 @ARMmbed/mbed-os-core