Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: upgrade-18 cherry-picks round 2 #10460

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: dev-upgrade-18
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mujahidkay
Copy link
Member

@mujahidkay mujahidkay commented Nov 13, 2024

Description

Cherry-picks the following commits from master:

Also adds a new upgrade name agoric-upgrade-18-basic-2.

used git cherry-pick for the above commits

@mujahidkay mujahidkay requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2024 10:42
@mujahidkay mujahidkay self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
@mujahidkay mujahidkay added the force:integration Force integration tests to run on PR label Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mhofman mhofman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a draft PR where we can see a reapply of the upgrade on top of rc0 to verify it would fix emerynet?

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ var upgradeNamesOfThisVersion = []string{
"agoric-upgrade-18-devnet",
"agoric-upgrade-18-emerynet",
"agoric-upgrade-18-basic",
"agoric-upgrade-18-basic-2",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While it doesn't change the behavior, we should have this new name return false in isPrimaryUpgradeName

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm also wondering if we should bikeshed the name as it's not really like basic or meant to be applied on its own

Copy link
Member Author

@mujahidkay mujahidkay Nov 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm also wondering if we should bikeshed the name as it's not really like basic or meant to be applied on its own

what do you suggest?

@mujahidkay
Copy link
Member Author

mujahidkay commented Nov 13, 2024

Is there a draft PR where we can see a reapply of the upgrade on top of rc0 to verify it would fix emerynet?

I can work on this today, and then attach it to this PR's description

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
force:integration Force integration tests to run on PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants