Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated wilms clustering notebooks 1/3 #862

Conversation

sjspielman
Copy link
Member

Trying again for #860!


Towards #850
Part of #852

This PR continues updates for the Wilms 06 module:

  • For Update the wilms 06 workflow script and GHA #852, I added the RUN_EXPLORATORY flag to the module's workflow, and I use it (so far!) to skip the 00b reference exploration notebook, and the 03 clustering notebook.
  • Even so, I also updated the 03 clustering notebook to be able to run in CI - for example, we might want such steps to run on pulls but not PRs? Any thoughts there?
    • Highly recommend to review with hidden whitespace, since this file also got styled
  • This PR also contains re-rendered notebooks for samples 168-179. Assuming this number of HTMLs is ok for GitHub's UI (which it seems to be 🤞 !) I will submit 2 more PRs with the remaining updated notebooks.

jaclyn-taroni
jaclyn-taroni previously approved these changes Nov 6, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jaclyn-taroni jaclyn-taroni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the check passes, this seems mostly good 👍🏻 However, please update the description of TESTING in the shell script before merging.

Comment on lines 5 to 7
# 1. The TESTING variable controls whether test data should be used.
# Setting TESTING=1 will use the test data.
# This variable is 0 by default.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't seem accurate – it controls whether or not particular steps are run. What data is being used is entirely controlled by what happens to be symlinked at data/current, or am I missing something?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, you're not missing something - this description needs tweaking.

@sjspielman sjspielman dismissed jaclyn-taroni’s stale review November 6, 2024 20:39

We caught a bug in the notebook

@sjspielman
Copy link
Member Author

Moving right along!

  • testing variable description fixed
  • textual bug fixed (it needed a unique 🫠 ), and while I was there, I fixed a bunch of typos too before re-rendering
  • notebooks re-rendered

Copy link
Member

@jaclyn-taroni jaclyn-taroni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻

@sjspielman sjspielman merged commit 6165a3f into AlexsLemonade:feature/wilms-tumor-06-azimuth Nov 6, 2024
3 checks passed
@sjspielman sjspielman deleted the sjspielman/updated-wilms-cluster-notebooks-batch1 branch November 6, 2024 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants