chore: Added systemlabel to graphql #1236
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new field, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (1)
Line range hint
1-395: Overall assessment: PR objectives met, consider documentation updatesThis PR successfully adds the
systemLabelto the GraphQL schema as intended. The implementation is sound, using a non-nullable enum type for the new field in theDialogtype. The update to theUUIDscalar declaration also improves the schema's documentation.To fully complete this PR:
- Ensure that all related documentation is updated to reflect the addition of
systemLabel.- Update the PR description to include information about the
UUIDscalar change, if not already mentioned.- Consider adding tests to verify the new
systemLabelfield's behavior in queries and mutations.- If not already done, update any affected resolvers or data models to support the new
systemLabelfield.These steps will ensure that the changes are fully integrated and documented, maintaining the quality and consistency of the codebase.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (2 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs (3)
Line range hint
1-255: Overall assessment of changes in ObjectTypes.csThe changes in this file align with the PR objective of adding a
systemLabelto GraphQL. The addition of theSystemLabelproperty to theDialogclass is appropriate. However, there are a few minor improvements and verifications suggested:
- Verify the necessity of the new using directive for MutationTypes.
- Add XML documentation for the new
SystemLabelproperty.- Ensure that the
SystemLabeltype is properly defined and accessible.These suggestions will improve code clarity and ensure proper integration of the new feature.
54-55: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Approve addition of SystemLabel property with suggestions.
The addition of the
SystemLabelproperty aligns with the PR objective. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Add XML documentation for this new property to improve code readability and maintainability.
- Ensure that the
SystemLabeltype is properly defined and accessible.Consider adding XML documentation:
/// <summary> /// Gets or sets the system label associated with this dialog. /// </summary> public SystemLabel SystemLabel { get; set; }#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of the SystemLabel type # Test 1: Check for the definition of SystemLabel type rg --type csharp -w "class SystemLabel" src # Test 2: Check for other usages of SystemLabel type rg --type csharp -w "SystemLabel" src
2-2: Verify the necessity of the new using directive.A new using directive for
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL.EndUser.MutationTypeshas been added. However, there's no visible usage of any types from this namespace in the provided code. Please ensure that this import is necessary, or consider removing it if unused.✅ Verification successful
Remove the unused using directive.
The
using Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL.EndUser.MutationTypesdirective is not utilized inObjectTypes.cs. Please consider removing it to clean up the code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if any types from the MutationTypes namespace are used in this file. # Test: Search for usage of types from MutationTypes namespace rg --type csharp -w "MutationTypes\." src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.csLength of output: 8457
docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (1)
395-395: LGTM! Good documentation practice.The update to the
UUIDscalar declaration is a positive change. By adding the@specifiedBydirective with the correct RFC URL, you've improved the schema's documentation and clarity without altering its functionality.This change aligns with best practices for GraphQL schema design by providing clear references to underlying specifications.
Description
Added systemLabel to graphQL
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)Summary by CodeRabbit
systemLabelfield to theDialogtype, enhancing metadata associated with each dialog.