chore: Added systemlabel to search #1238
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new field, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Fargekritt
force-pushed
the
chore/Systemlabel-search-GQL
branch
from
283ffcd to
ada6521
Compare
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/SearchDialogs/ObjectTypes.cs (1)
49-50: Add XML documentation for the new SystemLabel property.The addition of the
SystemLabelproperty enhances theSearchDialogclass with valuable metadata. However, for consistency with other properties in the class and to improve code documentation, consider adding XML documentation for this new property.Here's a suggested implementation:
+ /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets the system label associated with the dialog. + /// </summary> public SystemLabel SystemLabel { get; set; }docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (1)
196-196: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new field.The addition of the
systemLabelfield to theSearchDialogtype is consistent with theDialogtype and aligns with the PR objective. The field typeSystemLabel!is correct and non-nullable.Consider adding a description for the
systemLabelfield to provide context for API consumers. For example:"The system-assigned label for the dialog, indicating its current state or category." systemLabel: SystemLabel!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (1 hunks)
- src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/SearchDialogs/ObjectTypes.cs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/SearchDialogs/ObjectTypes.cs (1)
2-2: Verify the usage of the new namespace.A new using directive for
Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL.EndUser.MutationTypeshas been added. However, there's no visible usage of any types from this namespace in the provided code. Please ensure that this namespace is actually needed, possibly for the newSystemLabeltype.To confirm the usage of this namespace, run the following script:
docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (1)
196-196: Verify query impact and update documentationThe addition of the
systemLabelfield toSearchDialogis a backwards-compatible change. However, to ensure a smooth integration:
- Verify that existing queries using the
SearchDialogtype still work as expected.- Update any API documentation or usage examples to reflect this new field.
- Consider adding test cases that include the
systemLabelfield in search queries.To verify the impact on existing queries, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any existing queries that might be affected by the change.
Consider updating the project's documentation to reflect this schema change. This may include:
- Updating API documentation
- Revising any example queries that use the
SearchDialogtype- Updating integration guides or client documentation
Would you like assistance in identifying the relevant documentation files that might need updates?
✅ Verification successful
No existing queries use
SearchDialog; update documentation as neededThe
SearchDialogtype is not used in any existing GraphQL queries within the codebase. Therefore, the addition of thesystemLabelfield does not impact current functionalities.
- Documentation:
- Ensure that the API documentation and any usage examples are updated to include the new
systemLabelfield in theSearchDialogtype.- Review integration guides or client documentation to reflect this schema change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing usage of SearchDialog type in queries # Search for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog echo "Searching for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog:" rg --type ts --type js --type graphql 'query.*\{.*SearchDialog.*\}' -g '!node_modules' # Check if any queries are selecting all fields (which would now include systemLabel) echo "Checking for queries selecting all fields:" rg --type ts --type js --type graphql 'SearchDialog\s*\{\s*\.\.\..*\}' -g '!node_modules'Length of output: 448
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing usage of SearchDialog type in GraphQL queries by targeting .graphql files # Search for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog echo "Searching for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog:" rg 'query.*\{.*SearchDialog.*\}' --type-add 'graphql:*.graphql' --type graphql -g '!node_modules/**' # Check if any queries are selecting all fields, which would now include systemLabel echo "Checking for queries selecting all fields:" rg 'SearchDialog\s*\{\s*\.\.\..*\}' --type-add 'graphql:*.graphql' --type graphql -g '!node_modules/**'Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing usage of SearchDialog type in GraphQL queries by targeting .graphql and .gql files # Define GraphQL file extensions GRAPHQL_EXTENSIONS="*.graphql *.gql" # Search for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog echo "Searching for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog:" rg 'query\s+\w+\s*\{[^}]*SearchDialog[^}]*\}' --type-add "graphql:$GRAPHQL_EXTENSIONS" --type graphql -g '!node_modules/**' # Check if any queries are selecting all fields, which would now include systemLabel echo "Checking for queries selecting all fields in SearchDialog:" rg 'SearchDialog\s*\{\s*\.\.\.\s*\}' --type-add "graphql:$GRAPHQL_EXTENSIONS" --type graphql -g '!node_modules/**'Length of output: 807
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all GraphQL files in the repository to verify their existence and extensions echo "Listing all GraphQL files in the repository:" fd -e graphql -e gql -e graphqls -g '!node_modules/**' > graphql_files.txt echo "GraphQL files found:" cat graphql_files.txtLength of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing usage of SearchDialog type in GraphQL queries within identified GraphQL files # Ensure graphql_files.txt exists if [ ! -f graphql_files.txt ]; then echo "graphql_files.txt not found. Please run the file listing script first." exit 1 fi # Search for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog echo "Searching for GraphQL queries using SearchDialog in listed files:" rg 'query\s+\w+\s*\{[^}]*SearchDialog[^}]*\}' -f graphql_files.txt # Check if any queries are selecting all fields, which would now include systemLabel echo "Checking for queries selecting all fields in SearchDialog:" rg 'SearchDialog\s*\{\s*\.\.\.\s*\}' -f graphql_files.txtLength of output: 431
Added systemlabel to search
Description
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
systemLabelin theSearchDialog, enhancing metadata related to dialog categorization.Bug Fixes
Documentation
systemLabelfield.