Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes related to export of skeleton rest-xforms #1130

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 2, 2021

Conversation

pmolodo
Copy link
Contributor

@pmolodo pmolodo commented Jan 28, 2021

Some bugfixes for edge cases, and made it so that we export restXforms whenever we export bindXforms (ie, the restXforms are calculated from the bindXforms if present).

We were getting some errors in other tools if rest xforms weren't present (as well as an annoying warning/error from usdview, IIRC).

Paul Molodowitch added 3 commits January 28, 2021 14:21
…trix and members

...as the physicalIndex for the two attrs may not line up.

Also, use members.numConnectedElements() instead of .numElements(), as
using numElements() would sometimes cause a plug to get created when
memberPlug.connectedTo() was subsequently called, which for some reason
triggered a crash.
@pmolodo
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmolodo commented Jan 28, 2021

@dgovil recently touched some of this code, if he wants to take a look over...

@dgovil
Copy link
Collaborator

dgovil commented Jan 28, 2021

Also CC'ing @ysiewappl since he touched it too. (we treat my personal fork as a submission staging area)

Copy link
Contributor

@ysiewappl ysiewappl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this makes sense to fallback on the bind transforms, and might solve a problem we're seeing here as well on our end.

@@ -222,16 +221,16 @@ static bool _FindDagPoseMembers(
indices->resize(numDagPaths);

std::vector<uint8_t> visitedIndices(numDagPaths, 0);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < membersPlug.numElements(); ++i) {
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < membersPlug.numConnectedElements(); ++i) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind so much because I think this makes sense (this connection needs to exist anyway to be meaningful so the change will work), but what catches my eye is the reasoning; your comment seems suspicious that somehow connectedTo created a new element. Might be worth trying using evaluateNumElements to see if this is somehow an evaluation caching issue and if so worth reporting as a separate Maya bug.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, the thing where it was somehow creating an element was odd. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to fully investigate at the time, and I don't know if I'd be able to replicate now. I guess I also didn't feel too motivated too, since I feel like using .numConnectedElements() is conceptually better anyway.
If you want, I can edit the commit message, and remove the bit about the crash / element being created, or throw a bunch more caveats around it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not that big of a deal; if it's not something that you cannot reliably reproduce already, this code is fine as is (IMHO).

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pmolodo pmolodo Jan 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be clear - does the thumbs up mean you're ok with this as is? Or that you'd like me to edit the commit message?
Oops - guess you wrote a message that I didn't see while I was typing this. Will leave the commit as is.

GfMatrix4d* xform)
{
MStatus status;

MPlug xformMatrixPlug = dagPoseDep.findPlug("xformMatrix");
if (index < xformMatrixPlug.numElements()) {
MPlug xformPlug = xformMatrixPlug[index];
MPlug xformPlug = xformMatrixPlug.elementByLogicalIndex(logicalIndex, &status);
Copy link
Contributor

@ysiewappl ysiewappl Jan 29, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right now I know there's only one call site and the only indices stuffed in here should be the logical ones, but just in case, might be worth having debug assert to check if the logical index actually exists already via getExistingArrayAttributeIndices or similar.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is that if somehow that logical index doesn't exist yet, it will be created... which, as a fallback, seems ok to me.
Though I guess it might make sense to just put in a debug-only check / warning message, since it WOULD be an odd/unexpected occurence, which might warrent further investigation...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, added a check...

@pmolodo
Copy link
Contributor Author

pmolodo commented Jan 30, 2021

@kxl-adsk - are PF builds a little wonky again? I checked one of the failed builds, and the tests all passed - just some sort of permission error running a groovy script afterwards?

@ppt-adsk
Copy link
Collaborator

@kxl-adsk - are PF builds a little wonky again? I checked one of the failed builds, and the tests all passed - just some sort of permission error running a groovy script afterwards?

Yes, I got the same and reported it internally. Stay tuned.

@@ -136,7 +137,6 @@ static GfMatrix4d _GetJointWorldBindTransform(const MDagPath& dagPath)
CHECK_MSTATUS_AND_RETURN(status, GfMatrix4d(1));
MPlug plgWorldMatrices = fnNode.findPlug("worldMatrix", false, &status);
CHECK_MSTATUS_AND_RETURN(status, GfMatrix4d(1));
TF_VERIFY(membersIdx < plgWorldMatrices.numElements());

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you comment on why this check wasn't good?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's because membersIdx is a logical index, while numElements() gives the number of physical plugs... so the two aren't related.

"The Skeleton's 'restTransforms' property will not be "
"authored.",
skelPath.GetText());
TF_DEBUG(PXRUSDMAYA_TRANSLATORS)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interested to know why we want to switch this warning to a debug trace? (and same for the one below)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because we now have an additional fallback - we set the restTransforms from the bindPose - whereas before this would mean that we would "give up", and not author any restTransforms.

I don't mind changing either this or the next one back to TF_WARN if you want though.

Actually - on looking again, I think I'll definitely change the next one back to TF_WARN, because the inability to read the local transform shouldn't happen. (Whereas with this one, it merely indicates that there was no dagPose... which, while not standard, is still kosher.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed the second to TF_WARN, left this one as TF_DEBUG for now - let me know if you want this one back to TF_WARN as well:
afaea55

@@ -205,6 +207,49 @@ def testSkelWithoutBindPose(self):
animSource.GetTranslationsAttr().Get(5.0),
Vt.Vec3fArray([Gf.Vec3f(5.0, 5.0, 0.0)]))

def testSkelRestXformsWithNoDagPose(self):
"""
Tests export of of rest xforms when there is no dagPose node at all.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo: of of

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in afaea55

@kxl-adsk kxl-adsk added the import-export Related to Import and/or Export label Jan 30, 2021
- Switch TF_DEBUG back to TF_WARN if unable to read local transform from
  dagPose
  Autodesk#1130 (comment)
- "of of" typo
  Autodesk#1130 (comment)
@kxl-adsk kxl-adsk added the ready-for-merge Development process is finished, PR is ready for merge label Feb 1, 2021
@kxl-adsk kxl-adsk merged commit 4b98c88 into Autodesk:dev Feb 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
import-export Related to Import and/or Export ready-for-merge Development process is finished, PR is ready for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants