-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: batch simulate #6599
feat: batch simulate #6599
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like it 👍 Lets get CI happy and 🚢 it
const a = await contract.methods.get_shared_immutable_constrained_private().simulate(); | ||
const b = await contract.methods.get_shared_immutable_constrained_private_indirect().simulate(); | ||
const c = await contract.methods.get_shared_immutable().simulate(); | ||
const [a, b, c] = await new BatchCall(wallet, [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
… gj/batch_simulate
Benchmark resultsMetrics with a significant change:
Detailed resultsAll benchmarks are run on txs on the This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here. Proof generationEach column represents the number of threads used in proof generation.
L2 block published to L1Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.
L2 chain processingEach column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.
Circuits statsStats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every kernel circuit run across all benchmarks.
Stats on running time collected for app circuits
Tree insertion statsThe duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.
MiscellaneousTransaction sizes based on how many contract classes are registered in the tx.
Transaction size based on fee payment method | Metric | | Transaction processing duration by data writes.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FunctionData => selector changes LGTM!
Closes: #6549
Also removes
FunctionData
fromTxExecutionRequest
and a bunch of other places, in favor of just theFunctionSelector
(which is actually what's needed). This was missed from #3417 and was driving me crazy when trying to add a few more things toFunctionCall
. It had also leaked somehow into the AVM enqueued calls.