Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[In-proc] Worker termination path sanitizing #10397

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024

Conversation

surgupta-msft
Copy link
Contributor

@surgupta-msft surgupta-msft commented Aug 13, 2024

Issue describing the changes in this PR

resolves #issue_for_this_pr

Corresponding changes already merged in dev branch - #10367

Pull request checklist

IMPORTANT: Currently, changes must be backported to the in-proc branch to be included in Core Tools and non-Flex deployments.

  • Backporting to the in-proc branch is not required
    • Otherwise: Link to backporting PR
  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
    • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr
  • My changes do not require diagnostic events changes
    • Otherwise: I have added/updated all related diagnostic events and their documentation (Documentation issue linked to PR)
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

Additional information

Additional PR information

@surgupta-msft surgupta-msft requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2024 22:27
@surgupta-msft surgupta-msft merged commit 3b2b683 into in-proc Aug 15, 2024
10 checks passed
@surgupta-msft surgupta-msft deleted the surgupta/inproc-sanitize-worker-path branch August 15, 2024 17:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants