Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add VirtualHub Router autoscale configuration #19131

Merged

Conversation

AndriiKalinichenko
Copy link
Contributor

@AndriiKalinichenko AndriiKalinichenko commented May 19, 2022

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month. --- Already deployed
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. If updating an existing version, please select the specific language SDKs and CLIs that must be refreshed after the swagger is published.
    • SDK of .NET (need service team to ensure code readiness)
    • SDK of Python
    • SDK of Java
    • SDK of Js
    • SDK of Go
    • PowerShell
    • CLI
    • Terraform
    • No refresh required for updates in this PR

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties --- This PR is adding new properties. Skipping part below.
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in a stable version
  • Removing properties in a stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in a stable version
  • Updating API in a stable or public preview version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in public preview over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@ghost ghost added the Network label May 19, 2022
@jorgecotillo jorgecotillo added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label May 19, 2022
@raych1 raych1 self-assigned this May 20, 2022
@raych1 raych1 merged commit 41a8370 into Azure:network-2022-01-01 May 20, 2022
lirenhe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2022
* Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2021-08-01 to version 2022-01-01

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Updated Explicit proxy settings by adding one boolean field to it (#19011)

* API for provider port (#19041)

* Update readme.md

* Create expressRouteProviderPort.json

* Create expressRouteProviderPortList.json

* Create expressRouteProviderPort.json

* Update custom-words.txt

* Update expressRouteProviderPort.json

* Update expressRouteProviderPortList.json

* Update expressRouteProviderPort.json

* Add WAF match variable operators (#18925)

### webapplicationfirewall.json
* Add GreaterThanOrEquals operator and Any operator to custom rule
  match conditions in WAF policy spec

* Add VirtualHub Router autoscale configuration (#19131)

Co-authored-by: Andrii Kalinichenko <ankalini@microsoft.com>

* Adding rule priority to Tls Proxy routing rule object model (#19135)

Co-authored-by: Vinay Mundada <vimundad@microsoft.com>

* swagger changes for new ssl policies (#19183)

* Update Swagger Spec for VMSS Packet Capture (#19202)

* Update Swagger Spec for VMSS Packet Capture

* Remove extra line

* Update Swagger spec for Connection Monitor VMSS (#19203)

* Adding new endpoint in ConnectionMonitor

* Changing ConnectionMonitor endpoints order

* Add flushConnection to NSG (#19085)

* Merge NetworkManger into 2022-01-01 (#19169)

* Merge NetworkManger into 2022-01-01

* Remove EffectiveVnet APIs

* Remove SecurityUser Resource

* update readme

* Fix as comments

* fix as comments

* remove network group type

* Add new parameter noInternetAdvertise to CustomIPPrefix (#19340)

* fix

* fix

Co-authored-by: Weiheng Li <weihl@microsoft.com>

* Route Server Integration feature swagger changes (#19215)

* Route Server Integration feature swagger changes

* prettier run changes

* updating api version in examples file

* fixing test errors

* fixing test errors

* fixing modelvalidation errors

* fixing test errors

* fixing modelvalidation errors

* changes based on review comments

* fixing lintdiff failure

* updating examples

* update wrong enum value for customipprefix (#19382)

* fix

* fix

* fix

Co-authored-by: Weiheng Li <weihl@microsoft.com>

* Updated ExplicitProxySettings to ExplicitProxy on Firewall Policy ver2022-01-01 (#19299)

Co-authored-by: Gizachew Eshetie <v-geshetie@microsoft.com>

* Add resource type (#19434)

Co-authored-by: Andrii Kalinichenko <ankalini@microsoft.com>

* Fix prettier errors (#19462)

Co-authored-by: Andrii Kalinichenko <ankalini@microsoft.com>

Co-authored-by: uditmisra52 <103006702+uditmisra52@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jashsing-mic <79445297+jashsing-mic@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Anurag Kishore <kishore.1337.anurag@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: AndriiKalinichenko <kalinichenkoandrew@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrii Kalinichenko <ankalini@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Jayant Mundada <vinaymundada27@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vinay Mundada <vimundad@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: kaushik-ms <103559254+kaushik-ms@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: snagpal99 <95475229+snagpal99@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kumaam <102141910+kumaam@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Satya-anshu <70507845+Satya-anshu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: yanfa317 <53584318+yanfa317@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiheng Li <weihengli.tj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiheng Li <weihl@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Anchal Kapoor <ankapoo@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Gizachew-Eshetie <gizchanie@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gizachew Eshetie <v-geshetie@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review Network
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants