-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Storage] add new stroage account kind "FileStorage" and "BlockBlobStorage" and new feature fileaadIntegration #3864
Conversation
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-rubyNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-ruby |
"tags": [ | ||
"Usage" | ||
], | ||
"operationId": "Usage_List", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why this renaming from "Usages" to "Usage"? That's a SDK breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, just see that it was "Usage", and then it was renamed in 2018-03-01-preview as "Usages", and now rename back to "Usage". So I guess it's ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it should be usages. I will fix it.
Hi @blueww |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-go |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-javaNothing to generate for azure-sdk-for-java |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
}, | ||
"isHnsEnabled": { | ||
"type": "boolean", | ||
"default": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on a recent issue found by @williexu in the CLI, please also remove this default value.
}, | ||
"supportsHttpsTrafficOnly": { | ||
"type": "boolean", | ||
"default": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on a recent issue found by @williexu in the CLI, please also remove this default value.
@lmazuel We will add back Management policies to a stable api version when the feature GA in the future. |
ee55d36
to
3499e47
Compare
7a5b7c3
to
fc863cb
Compare
@lmazuel |
specification/storage/resource-manager/Microsoft.Storage/stable/2018-07-01/storage.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
input-file: | ||
- Microsoft.Storage/stable/2018-07-01/storage.json | ||
- Microsoft.Storage/stable/2018-07-01/blob.json | ||
- Microsoft.Storage/stable/2018-07-01/managementpolicy.json |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please put the new split file in “2018-03-01-preview” folder, and just reference it from here:
- Microsoft.Storage/stable/2018-07-01/storage.json
- Microsoft.Storage/stable/2018-07-01/blob.json
- Microsoft.Storage/stable/2018-03-01-preview/managementpolicy.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed.
@lmazuel Since the release is target Ignite, and we need to raise and review SDK PR after the swagger PR is in, would you please help to review and merge the PR asap if no other issues. Thanks very much! |
@hovsepm , since you already approved, merging the PR. Thanks! |
@blueww Hi Wei, just a quick question I see this AAD support coming to AzureFiles, is this the same as what was just released at ignite as that also required the use of Azure Active Directory Domain Services which is a real pain compared to say the new AAD for object storage which doesn't Please let me know your thoughts Hass |
@hassanbabaie |
Thank you for the quick response and that answers my questions as it still uses Azure AD Domain Services (AAD DS) however I will also follow up to the e-mail address with feedback Hass |
…#3864) * Added sku/dev (for MIAA/PG) and uploadWatermark (for data controller) in swagger * set proper default boolean value for sku.dev * fix an issue flagged by prettier Co-authored-by: Yuqing Li <yuqingli@ntdev.microsoft.com>
This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.
Rest Spec: https://microsoft.sharepoint.com/teams/AzureStorage/_layouts/15/Doc.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B00d45481-7f25-4170-a95e-82dbc6a3041d%7D&action=default&slrid=0d385f9e-a0fa-0000-758b-e5dde88dbd09
Pass review on private repo:
New Kind: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/538
FileAAdIntegration: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs-pr/pull/508
PR information
api-version
in the path should match theapi-version
in the spec).Quality of Swagger