Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[textanalytics] add extractive summarization samples #20010

Merged

Conversation

kristapratico
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@kristapratico kristapratico merged commit 3729b53 into Azure:feature/TA-v3.2-preview.1 Jul 30, 2021
@kristapratico kristapratico deleted the ext-sum-samples branch July 30, 2021 23:05
kristapratico added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2021
* [textanalytics] regenerate v3.2-preview.1 (#19805)

* update swagger readme

* regenerate code for v3.2-preview.1

* fixes for hooking up convenience layer to generated layer

* remove unnecessary check

* [textanalytics] adds extractive summarization action (#19824)

* update swagger readme

* regenerate code for v3.2-preview.1

* fixes for hooking up convenience layer to generated layer

* add support for extract summary action

* align naming

* missed one

* readme and changelog

* fixing docstrings

* add some extract summary action tests

* update sync/async sample to include summary action

* fix disable_service_logs default

* test rank score

* add bug fix to changelog

* add missing reprs to new models

* add test for extract summary partial results

* update changelog to specify API version now targeting

* regen on latest swagger

* target swagger in repo and fix sample docs whitespace

* remove support for python 3.5 (#19913)

* [textanalytics] add extractive summarization samples (#20010)

* add extractive summarization samples

* wording

* [textanalytics] rerecord tests (#20045)

* rerecord everything but healthcare

* linting

* rerecord healthcare tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants