Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[UX] Confusing Selector in Layers #2556

Open
1 task done
jolevesq opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

[UX] Confusing Selector in Layers #2556

jolevesq opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jolevesq
Copy link
Member

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

From OSDP

When the Layers tab is selected along with a specific sublayer, a configurable list of checkboxed items is available to toggle visibility of the sublayer components. If there’s more than one option with a checkbox then the list begins with an item in the same format as the list called “Name”, with the same vertical separation as the other list items. To the end user, this appears as just another list item that happens to be missing its icon.

However, what the real intent is for this line is to provide the user with the power to toggle the visibility of all items on or off in a single click. To fix the UX to convey this I recommend the following:

Format the master header as a header, bolding it to differentiate it from a detail item

If the vertical distance between each item is 1 unit, give it 1.5 units before starting the first item below the title, again setting the title apart

Rename the title from Name to something meaningful, telling the user what it will do for them and that’s aligned with the vocabulary used in the viewer now, like Toggle visibility

JIRA: https://fgp-pgf.atlassian.net/browse/OSDP-1849

Expected Behavior

Change control name from name to toggle visibility

Steps To Reproduce

No response

Anything else?

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant