-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CesiumMath.factorial has issue #7888 #7890
Conversation
this action is done according to the contributing guidelines
the function logic fixed
Thanks for the pull request @rshaikhha!
Reviewers, don't forget to make sure that:
|
This request is ready |
Contributor License Agreement (CLA) set via email rshaikhha@gmail.com |
Thanks @rshaikhha! We got the email, but the person who reviews the CLAs is out of the office. We'll review this PR as soon as we get the okay. |
@hpinkos Thanks Hannah, any news from CLA? |
Thanks again for your contribution @rshaikhha! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
1 similar comment
Thanks again for your contribution @rshaikhha! No one has commented on this pull request in 30 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? I'm going to re-bump this in 30 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with |
This was actually fixed in #7969. Thanks again for reporting this! |
current version of CesiumMath.factorial function has a bug reported in issue #7888.
the problem can be fixed by a simple logic correction