Make mods, vips, joined/parted messages searchable #3426
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zneix
approved these changes
Dec 25, 2021
|
thank you so much for taking care of this, looks perfect! |
Mm2PL
approved these changes
Dec 25, 2021
pajlada
deleted the
feat/make-mods-vip-joined-part-messages-searchable
branch
zneix
added a commit
to SevenTV/chatterino7
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 25, 2021
Now we're on commit efcef61; Changes from upstream we've pulled - Minor: Sorted usernames in `Users joined/parted` messages alphabetically. (Chatterino#3421) - Minor: Mod list, VIP list, and Users joined/parted messages are now searchable. (Chatterino#3426) - Bugfix: Fixed IRC mentions not showing up in the /mentions split. (Chatterino#3400)
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request checklist:
CHANGELOG.mdwas updated, if applicableDescription
Fixes #3425
Originally @zneix's solution, but cut out of PR #3421 to make the PR smaller