Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merge] Adjust ExecutionPayload.transaction type with new Transaction Union structure #4362

Merged

Conversation

Nashatyrev
Copy link
Contributor

@Nashatyrev Nashatyrev commented Sep 14, 2021

PR Description

This PR based on top of #4361

  • create a dedicated Transaction Union structure for cleaner code
  • adjust ExecutionPayload.transaction with type SszList<Transaction>

Fixed Issue(s)

Part of #4226

Reduces number of failing ref tests from 633 to 170

Documentation

  • I thought about documentation and added the documentation label to this PR if updates are required.

Changelog

  • I thought about adding a changelog entry, and added one if I deemed necessary.

@Nashatyrev Nashatyrev mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2021
20 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@ajsutton ajsutton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. See comments on the SszUnion stuff from the other PR.

@ajsutton
Copy link
Contributor

Confirmed this gets all the ssz_static reference tests passing which is great.

@ajsutton ajsutton mentioned this pull request Sep 15, 2021
2 tasks
…-transaction-type

# Conflicts:
#	ssz/src/main/java/tech/pegasys/teku/ssz/impl/SszUnionImpl.java
#	ssz/src/main/java/tech/pegasys/teku/ssz/schema/SszUnionSchema.java
#	ssz/src/main/java/tech/pegasys/teku/ssz/schema/impl/SszUnionSchemaImpl.java
@Nashatyrev Nashatyrev merged commit 1f8405d into Consensys:merge-interop Sep 15, 2021
@Nashatyrev Nashatyrev deleted the merge/add-transaction-type branch November 18, 2021 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants