Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not deploy LB when average load is too small #2299

Closed
lifflander opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2333
Closed

Do not deploy LB when average load is too small #2299

lifflander opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2333
Assignees

Comments

@lifflander
Copy link
Collaborator

lifflander commented Jun 11, 2024

          This lower bound should not be hardcoded, but rather use either a machine-dependent absolute quantity (i.e., square root of machine epsilon) or, better yet, a lower bound that uses first principles.

Originally posted by @ppebay in #2278 (comment)

For now replace the hard-coded value with the return value of a function implemented in baseLB, make all LB algorithms use it (except for the testing ones), and have this function for now return the hard-coded value.

nlslatt added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2024
…to-small-average-load

#2299: Do not deploy LB when average load is smaller than estimated load balancing cost
cz4rs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants