-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
ci: skip flaky service names test on macos #15321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
There is also this: #15320 |
|
converted to draft because #15320 will probably resolve this issue |
|
|
Bootstrap import analysisComparison of import times between this PR and base. SummaryThe average import time from this PR is: 261 ± 6 ms. The average import time from base is: 261 ± 4 ms. The import time difference between this PR and base is: 0.4 ± 0.2 ms. The difference is not statistically significant (z = 1.69). Import time breakdownThe following import paths have grown:
|
Performance SLOsComparing candidate emmett.butler/service-names-mac (610f343) with baseline main (dbe8eb7) 📈 Performance Regressions (1 suite)📈 telemetryaddmetric - 30/30✅ 1-count-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.204µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -84.0%) vs baseline: 📈 +10.8% Memory: ✅ 34.505MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.8%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 200.860µs (SLO: <220.000µs -8.7%) vs baseline: +1.0% Memory: ✅ 34.583MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 1-distribution-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.336µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -83.3%) vs baseline: +1.3% Memory: ✅ 34.485MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 1-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 219.055µs (SLO: <220.000µs 🟡 -0.4%) vs baseline: +1.2% Memory: ✅ 34.583MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ 1-gauge-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 2.159µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -89.2%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.564MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ 1-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 136.073µs (SLO: <150.000µs -9.3%) vs baseline: -0.8% Memory: ✅ 34.564MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ 1-rate-metric-1-timesTime: ✅ 3.411µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -82.9%) vs baseline: 📈 +11.6% Memory: ✅ 34.485MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ 1-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 212.073µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -15.2%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ 100-count-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 20.093ms (SLO: <22.000ms -8.7%) vs baseline: +0.5% Memory: ✅ 34.524MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ 100-distribution-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.284ms (SLO: <2.300ms 🟡 -0.7%) vs baseline: +1.1% Memory: ✅ 34.564MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +4.9% ✅ 100-gauge-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 1.410ms (SLO: <1.550ms -9.0%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 34.564MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.6%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ 100-rate-metrics-100-timesTime: ✅ 2.191ms (SLO: <2.550ms 📉 -14.1%) vs baseline: -0.1% Memory: ✅ 34.446MB (SLO: <35.500MB -3.0%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ flush-1-metricTime: ✅ 4.661µs (SLO: <20.000µs 📉 -76.7%) vs baseline: +1.4% Memory: ✅ 34.465MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.9%) vs baseline: +4.6% ✅ flush-100-metricsTime: ✅ 173.258µs (SLO: <250.000µs 📉 -30.7%) vs baseline: -1.0% Memory: ✅ 34.544MB (SLO: <35.500MB -2.7%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ flush-1000-metricsTime: ✅ 2.111ms (SLO: <2.500ms 📉 -15.6%) vs baseline: -0.7% Memory: ✅ 35.291MB (SLO: <36.500MB -3.3%) vs baseline: +4.9% 🟡 Near SLO Breach (1 suite)🟡 otelspan - 22/22✅ add-eventTime: ✅ 38.780ms (SLO: <47.150ms 📉 -17.8%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 38.957MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.1%) vs baseline: +4.4% ✅ add-metricsTime: ✅ 255.559ms (SLO: <344.800ms 📉 -25.9%) vs baseline: -0.7% Memory: ✅ 43.376MB (SLO: <47.500MB -8.7%) vs baseline: +5.0% ✅ add-tagsTime: ✅ 316.549ms (SLO: <321.000ms 🟡 -1.4%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 43.296MB (SLO: <47.500MB -8.9%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ get-contextTime: ✅ 78.841ms (SLO: <92.350ms 📉 -14.6%) vs baseline: +0.6% Memory: ✅ 39.395MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -15.3%) vs baseline: +5.2% ✅ is-recordingTime: ✅ 36.148ms (SLO: <44.500ms 📉 -18.8%) vs baseline: +0.7% Memory: ✅ 38.792MB (SLO: <47.500MB 📉 -18.3%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ record-exceptionTime: ✅ 57.237ms (SLO: <67.650ms 📉 -15.4%) vs baseline: +0.4% Memory: ✅ 39.472MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -16.0%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ set-statusTime: ✅ 42.505ms (SLO: <50.400ms 📉 -15.7%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 38.768MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.5%) vs baseline: +4.8% ✅ startTime: ✅ 35.648ms (SLO: <43.450ms 📉 -18.0%) vs baseline: +0.9% Memory: ✅ 38.913MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.2%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ start-finishTime: ✅ 83.899ms (SLO: <88.000ms -4.7%) vs baseline: +2.8% Memory: ✅ 36.628MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -21.2%) vs baseline: +5.1% ✅ start-finish-telemetryTime: ✅ 83.323ms (SLO: <89.000ms -6.4%) vs baseline: ~same Memory: ✅ 36.569MB (SLO: <46.500MB 📉 -21.4%) vs baseline: +4.7% ✅ update-nameTime: ✅ 37.481ms (SLO: <45.150ms 📉 -17.0%) vs baseline: +1.8% Memory: ✅ 38.966MB (SLO: <47.000MB 📉 -17.1%) vs baseline: +4.8%
|
|
#15320 did not resolve this issue |
This change skips a test that failed on main a few times yesterday
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py/actions/runs/19462441683/job/55689627657
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py/actions/runs/19435929546/job/55606604120