-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-12-28] [HOLD for payment 2023-12-12] [$500] Room - Error shows up when saving existing and valid room name with any changes #32398
Comments
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
Triggered auto assignment to @nkuoch ( |
Issue is not reproduced on production bandicam.2023-12-02.20-38-35-769.mp4 |
regression from #30996 |
ProposalProblemRoom - Error shows up when saving existing and valid room name with any changes Root CauseinputValues[ Changes Suggested to fixwe need to initialize the if (_.isUndefined(inputValues[inputID])) {
const { defaultValue, valueParser, displayParser, valueType } = propsToParse;
inputValues[inputID] = (valueParser && defaultValue) ? valueParser(defaultValue) : defaultValue || getInitialValueByType(valueType);
if (displayParser) {
inputValues[`${inputID}ToDisplay`] = displayParser(defaultValue);
}
} |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0106db335debd1ea53 |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @Santhosh-Sellavel ( |
Current assignee @Santhosh-Sellavel is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Privileging @kowczarz to do the fix as he is the author of the original PR. |
Hello, I'm working on fix right now. |
📣 @Santhosh-Sellavel Please request via NewDot manual requests for the Reviewer role ($500) |
@ishpaul777 has correctly localised the root problem, but my solution will slightly differ in syntax. I don't see any reasons to write another proposal. Can I proceed to the PR? |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
Revert deployed so removing the blocker label. |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.7-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-12-12. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
No payments due as this was a regression & the PR caused this got reverted. We are good to close! |
Sounds good. Thanks everyone! |
@nkuoch @luacmartins just curious if should expect a compensation as the new PR will include a solution similar to fix i suggested in proposal just different syntax wise #32398 (comment) |
I think so, but let's wait for the new PR to be ready to be reviewed, tested and approved first. So we can make sure the solution worked. |
Okay! Thanks for clarifying! |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.14-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-12-28. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 1.4.7-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Room name is saved successfully as the existing room name is valid.
Actual Result:
Error shows up when saving existing valid room name with any changes.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6298723_1701527125984.bandicam_2023-12-02_20-36-02-824.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: