Implement Bottom Tab Navigator

[hayata-suenaga]

As part of the Ideal Nav overhaul, implement the Bottom Tab Navigator according to the requirements specified in the design doc.

Parent Issue: #32689

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @joekaufmanexpensify (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.

[hayata-suenaga]

@adamgrzybowski from Software Mansion is going to work on this issue 🎉

[adamgrzybowski]

👋

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Going to unassign myself for now, since this we already have someone assigned for this, and it's a new feature rather than a bug. If any BZ work (like issuing payment) is required at any point, please re-assign me, and I'll handle it!

[melvin-bot]

@adamgrzybowski Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this?

[hayata-suenaga]

I remember @adamgrzybowski is taking OOO. I'll change the priority of this issue to weekly until he's back.

[melvin-bot]

@adamgrzybowski Still overdue 6 days?! Let's take care of this!

[melvin-bot]

@adamgrzybowski 10 days overdue. I'm getting more depressed than Marvin.

[melvin-bot]

@adamgrzybowski 12 days overdue now... This issue's end is nigh!

[melvin-bot]

This issue has not been updated in over 14 days. @adamgrzybowski eroding to Weekly issue.

[trjExpensify]

Critical priority, putting this back on Daily now we're all back.

[melvin-bot]

@adamgrzybowski Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too...

[hayata-suenaga]

I'll change the priority of this issue to weekly as the PR is actively being worked on.

we just need this issue to figure out when the work is done

[luacmartins]

assigning myself to help review and get this merged asap since it's a blocker for simplified collect

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[s77rt]

Can someone assign me here?

[luacmartins]

Done!

[hayata-suenaga]

@s77rt were you assigned here for the big feature branch you reviewed? I feel like I assigned you somewhere else 🤔

[hayata-suenaga]

@s77rt you were assigned to this issue

[s77rt]

@hayata-suenaga Maybe deja-vu? 😅 Yeah I'm assigned there too. That's the main issue. This one is only part of it. I thought it makes sense to be assigned on both.

[hayata-suenaga]

I made you're paid more than the standard amount for the PR you reviewed in the other issue.

I'll keep you assigned to this issue, but payment is not needed here

also, closing this issue as the PR has been deployed to production