[New architecture] Upgrade react-native-camera-roll

[j-piasecki]

We need to upgrade this library in order to use the new architecture in the App.

More context: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1707293299589539
Discussion here: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1707293338290529

[roryabraham]

New feat, not a bug. Recategorizing.

[roryabraham]

@zanyrenney for context, this task was just forked off of the larger initiative to enable the new React Native Architecture in E/App so we can make a series of more bite-sized changes. SWM will handle this.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @dylanexpensify (NewFeature), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/14418#:~:text=BugZero%20process%20steps%20for%20feature%20requests for more details.

[BartoszGrajdek]

Hey! I'm Bartosz from Software Mansion and I would like to work on this task.

[roryabraham]

C+ review should be paid out at $250 instead of $500 for this issue

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @jasperhuangg, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[roryabraham]

@BartoszGrajdek the PR(s) for this were reverted, so we need to redo it.

[situchan]

@BartoszGrajdek the PR(s) for this were reverted, so we need to redo it.

redoing here #37316

[jasperhuangg]

Not overdue!

[jasperhuangg]

Hey @situchan @BartoszGrajdek what's the latest on this? Are we good to close this out? It looks like the PR redoing things was merged and deployed to production a while ago

[situchan]

Looks like @mollfpr's payment is pending if not paid elsewhere.
Payment summary: #35986 (comment)

Sorry, it's different PR. I think we can close this

[thesahindia]

C+ review should be paid out at $250 instead of $500 for this issue

Requesting payment on new dot for reviewing #36154 This can be closed.

[thesahindia]

@roryabraham, can you please assign me here and confirm the payment for me?

[jasperhuangg]

@roryabraham Can you confirm if we're good to pay out @thesahindia?

[roryabraham]

yes, for sure we can complete payment for @thesahindia's review of #36154 then close this out

[roryabraham]

since the request is going through NewDot, I'm going to close this GitHub issue

[JmillsExpensify]

$250 approved for @thesahindia based on this comment.