-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-03-07] [$500] Bank account - Selected bank account is not checked in bank account selection step #37290
Comments
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01f67808490772984d |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @jjcoffee ( |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
Triggered auto assignment to @flodnv ( |
We think that this bug might be related to #vip-bills |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Selected bank account is not checked in bank account selection step What is the root cause of that problem?We forget to pass App/src/components/RadioButtons.tsx Line 58 in cfa0ae3
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Pass App/src/components/AddPlaidBankAccount.js Lines 298 to 304 in cfa0ae3
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)N/A |
Probably good, do you agree with the fix @jjcoffee @roryabraham @danieldoglas ? |
That sounds good to me as well, I noticed that happening on #37271 as well, but the error logged is different there. |
Actually problem related with this PR ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Bank account - Selected bank account is not checked in bank account selection step What is the root cause of that problem?Since we added useEffect in this PR App/src/components/RadioButtons.tsx Lines 42 to 47 in 22b6390
but don't pass As result every time when we change Because for all cases value(undefined) is not equal checkedValue What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?To fix this issue we can don't change App/src/components/RadioButtons.tsx Lines 42 to 47 in 22b6390
And as additional information App/src/components/AddPlaidBankAccount.js Line 89 in 4059b7f
App/src/components/AddPlaidBankAccount.js Lines 299 to 304 in 4059b7f
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)As alternative, we can add ![]() Plus I think we need refactor this component and don't use And to me it looks like duplication of props |
@ZhenjaHorbach hmm thanks for checking that. Yeah, thanks for pointing out that pull request. I think checking if the value exists makes sense since most of the forms are not using value outside of the form like it's the case with the exit survey and that property was just implemented. @roryabraham @mollfpr what do you think? |
@ZhenjaHorbach's proposal LGTM and makes sense that it comes from #34925 given this is only happening on staging. Also agree that checking if App/src/components/RadioButtons.tsx Lines 35 to 36 in 22b6390
🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed |
Current assignee @flodnv is eligible for the choreEngineerContributorManagement assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Leaving this to you @roryabraham since you originally wrote the code |
whoops, my mistake. I made RadioButtons a controlled component without refactoring other usages to be controlled. I like @ZhenjaHorbach's proposal to make it work as controlled or uncontrolled, but I think that we can leave |
📣 @jjcoffee 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reviewer role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
📣 @ZhenjaHorbach 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! Offer link |
btw @ZhenjaHorbach, are you in the #expensify-open-source slack room? |
Yeah, sure ) |
what's your Slack handle? |
Pr will be ready today |
HorbachY |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.45-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-03-07. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
Regression Test Proposal
Do we agree 👍 or 👎 |
Issue is ready for payment but no BZ is assigned. @Christinadobrzyn you are the lucky winner! Please verify the payment summary looks correct and complete the checklist. Thanks! |
Payouts due: Contributor: $500 @ZhenjaHorbach (paid in Upwork - https://www.upwork.com/nx/wm/workroom/36490106/overview) Upwork job is here. Regression test here - https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/376594 closing |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: v1.4.44-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal team
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The selected bank account is checked in the checkbox.
Actual Result:
The selected bank account is not checked in the checkbox.
This issue also occurs with the checkbox in Company owner steps.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6393828_1709031318790.20240227_074738.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: