-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-03-11] [$500] Workspace - The selection is smaller than member name row when navigating via keyboard #37293
Comments
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~010ded8f191a9831bf |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @hoangzinh ( |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
Triggered auto assignment to @pecanoro ( |
We think that this bug might be related to #wave5-free-submitters |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.The selection that appears on the member is smaller in size than the member name row What is the root cause of that problem?We have a redundant condition in What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?In here, remove If it's desirable to isolate this logic only to the workspace members list, we can introduce a new prop to control whether to apply this behavior We can also consider applying the below C+ suggestion, if that style is more suitable
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)NA |
@dukenv0307 proposal #37293 (comment) looks good to me. It's regression from PR #37074. 🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed |
Current assignee @pecanoro is eligible for the choreEngineerContributorManagement assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Ideally, this should be fixed by the author of the PR that broke it but since you guys identified the problem and have a solution, let's do that. This doesn't need to be a blocker since it's super minor. |
📣 @hoangzinh 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reviewer role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
📣 @dukenv0307 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! Offer link |
Ah, I think @burczu might be fixing this already here: #37199 CC: @shawnborton |
@trjExpensify I don't see the fix included in the PR code changes, I think it's not being handled there
@pecanoro Thank you! I'm raising a PR now |
@hoangzinh this PR is ready for preview. |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.46-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-03-11. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
Issue is ready for payment but no BZ is assigned. @JmillsExpensify you are the lucky winner! Please verify the payment summary looks correct and complete the checklist. Thanks! |
@JmillsExpensify, @pecanoro, @hoangzinh, @dukenv0307 Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
BugZero Checklist:
|
@JmillsExpensify All yours! |
@JmillsExpensify, @pecanoro, @hoangzinh, @dukenv0307 Still overdue 6 days?! Let's take care of this! |
Great thanks! Payment summary as follows:
I'll process both of these now via Upwork. |
No regression test needed and contributors paid out, so closing. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 1.4.44-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The selection that appears on the member is of the same size as the member name row
Actual Result:
The selection that appears on the member is smaller in size than the member name row
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6393859_1709032413225.bandicam_2024-02-27_10-17-14-050.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @JmillsExpensifyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: