-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expense - Transaction thread with violation does not appear in LHN #37405
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @MitchExpensify ( |
@MitchExpensify I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors. |
We think that this bug might be related to #wave6-collect-submitters |
This does look like wave 6 to me too, what do you think @greg-schroeder ? |
Not sure how the quarterly release impacts this issue's priority, I still think confirming if its a wave 6 related issue is a good first step so bumpin ya for an opinion there @greg-schroeder |
@MitchExpensify Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
Wave collect worthy Señor Wave Collect, @trjExpensify ? |
This would be to do with violations, and we're putting those in #wave-control now. CC: @JmillsExpensify That said, I would test this one as violations has been in active development, and I think it might be known or fixed now. CC: @cead22 |
Issue is fixed 20240312_225934.mp4 |
I also can no longer reproduce - Closing! |
This issue is reproducible again, but now it's not reproducible in production. I added Steps the same:
Recording.2251.mp4Staging Production |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
Triggered auto assignment to @danieldoglas ( |
@danieldoglas I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors. Thanks |
@cead22 I remember you said you found new issues with violations last Friday. Is this related? |
I don't think this is a blocker since Violations is still in a beta. Additionally, I think this might be because we reverted this PR due to performance issues since that PR added report errors to the LHN. |
@danieldoglas @MitchExpensify this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to a solution? Let's make sure we're treating this as a top priority. Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks! |
I couldn't repro on v1.4.52-1 staging desktop web 1wBjJrPYLE.mp4 |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Found when validating PR : #35449
Version Number: v1.4.44-7
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause-Internal Team
Action Performed:
Precondition:
Expected Result:
The transaction thread with violation will appear in LHN.
Actual Result:
The transaction thread with violation does not appear in LHN unless it is visited.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Bug6395021_1709091888120.bandicam_2024-02-28_02-49-56-207.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: