Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor workspace settings #11615

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 20, 2022

Conversation

mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor

@mollfpr mollfpr commented Oct 5, 2022

Details

Refactoring workspace settings form to use Form.js and dismiss keyboard after form submission.

Fixed Issues

$ #11195
$ #11195 (comment)

Tests

  • UI looks as it did before the refactor
  • Values can be added and edited
  • Errors are highlighted correctly (input border)
  • Error messages show up correctly
  • Form alerts are displayed correctly
  • Clicking the fix the errors link focuses the first input with error
  • No duplicate submission of the form occurs (when it's already submitting)

Saving a workspace name should close the keyboard

  1. Go to the workspace section
  2. Click on the workspace name
  3. Form input will come to address the change in the name
  4. Once the desired name is input, press the save button
  5. On the native app and mWeb verified that the keyboard is closed after pressing the save button
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

QA Steps

  • UI looks as it did before the refactor
  • Values can be added and edited
  • Errors are highlighted correctly (input border)
  • Error messages show up correctly
  • Form alerts are displayed correctly
  • Clicking the fix the errors link focuses the first input with error
  • No duplicate submission of the form occurs (when it's already submitting)

Saving a workspace name should close the keyboard

  1. Go to the workspace section
  2. Click on the workspace name
  3. Form input will come to address the change in the name
  4. Once the desired name is input, press the save button
  5. On the native app and mWeb verified that the keyboard is closed after pressing the save button
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Review Checklist

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

Web

5BWorkspaceSettings.5D-Web.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

WorkspaceSettings.-mWeb.Chrome.Android.mov

Mobile Web - Safari

5BWorkspaceSettings.5D-mWeb.20Safari-iOS.mov

Desktop

WorkspaceSettings.-Desktop.mov

iOS

WorkspaceSettings.-iOS.mov

Android

WorkspaceSettings.-Android.mov

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 5, 2022

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@mollfpr mollfpr marked this pull request as ready for review October 5, 2022 18:15
@mollfpr mollfpr requested a review from a team as a code owner October 5, 2022 18:15
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Luke9389 and rushatgabhane and removed request for a team October 5, 2022 18:15
@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

Holding on review until #11039 is merged

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mollfpr commented Oct 10, 2022

Pulled main!

@rushatgabhane Whenever you ready 👍

@@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ const propTypes = {
name: PropTypes.string,
}).isRequired,

/** Option to not use the default scroll view */
shouldNotUseScrollView: PropTypes.bool,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question: wanted to understand a bit more about this prop, why is it needed?

is form being nested inside a ScrollView causing a problem?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is form being nested inside a ScrollView causing a problem?

Yes. The ScrollView in WorkspacePageWithSections makes the submit button of Form.js not placed on the bottom.
Screen Shot 2022-10-12 at 17 07 51

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane Oct 17, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mollfpr okay, thanks!

If my understanding is correct, if we refactor all pages to use Form.js then we won't be needing this prop and we can directly return the children.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rushatgabhane Yup, we won’t need that eventually.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thought: after all pages have been refactored, we'll have to follow by with removing shouldNotUseScrollView from all pages.

Suggestion: create a shouldUseScrollView prop that is used by old pages not using Form. This way everything gets removed automatically.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rushatgabhane the only other solution I came up with was to not use WorkspacePageWithSections, but I don't think that's better.

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane Oct 18, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alright, thanks for looking into this @luacmartins
@mollfpr please ping me once you've made the changes 🙇‍♂️

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rushatgabhane I guess we can use shouldUseScrollView instead but need to update the other pages that use WorkspacePageWithSections. Are you on board with this?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mollfpr yes, that'd be my suggestion. Feel free to disagree/provide your input

#11615 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rushatgabhane I agree with your suggestion! I'll update the PR, thanks!

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mollfpr commented Oct 18, 2022

@rushatgabhane I updated the PR and also reverted the Form.js changes because the issue is fixed here.

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mollfpr bug: clicking fix the error message doesn't focus the text input

Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.1.59.59.AM.mov

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Oct 19, 2022

This PR also fixes #12008 (but it should be closed as a dupe as it would have been converted to a refactor issue too)

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mollfpr commented Oct 19, 2022

@rushatgabhane I just pulled the latest main, it should be fixed the issue by clicking the error text to focus the input.

src/pages/workspace/WorkspaceSettingsPage.js Show resolved Hide resolved
const errors = {};
if (!this.state.name.trim().length) {
errors.nameError = true;
if (!values.name.trim().length) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same thing here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just add more conditions to the name validation. It will catch the null or undefined value.

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

@mollfpr can you please add tests for the original issue as well?

@mollfpr
Copy link
Contributor Author

mollfpr commented Oct 20, 2022

@rushatgabhane Added the original issue test and update the checklist with the latest template!

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Member

rushatgabhane commented Oct 20, 2022

Web

Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.6.24.36.AM.mov

mWeb

Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.8.59.57.PM.mov

Desktop

Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.9.04.33.PM.mov

Android

Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.9.16.16.PM.mov

iOS

Screen.Recording.2022-10-20.at.9.17.00.PM.mov

PR Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Luke9389 LGTM! 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit 5369f78 into Expensify:main Oct 20, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2022

@luacmartins looks like this was merged without passing tests. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Oct 20, 2022
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Tests passed. Removing Emergency label.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @luacmartins in version: 1.2.19-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅


</View>
</ScrollView>
{this.props.shouldUseScrollView
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this.props.shouldUseScrollView could use a better name.
It should indicate why we want to use scroll view.

Copy link
Member

@rushatgabhane rushatgabhane Oct 28, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah

What do you think of something like isNotUsingForm? Because we're going to remove this prop whenever all the pages get refactored.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @chiragsalian in version: 1.2.19-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants