Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only show call button in Concierge and assistance page for eligible users #14499

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 27, 2023

Conversation

francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

@francoisl francoisl commented Jan 24, 2023

Hold until https://github.com/Expensify/Web-Expensify/pull/36149 is deployed to production

Changes

  • Only show the Call button in Concierge and the Get Assistance page for people eligible for Guide calls (i.e. have a guide assigned)
  • When clicking the button/option, open the Guide's calendar appointment booking link instead of the call modal

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/255964

Tests

For Expensify internal engineers:

  1. If you haven't set up any guides locally yet, follow this SO post
  2. Make sure your guide accounts all have a expensify_googleCalendarLink NVP set. If not, set it with anything as the value (doesn't necessarily need to be a valid Google Calendar link)
  3. Follow the QA steps below
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Receiving the updated assigned guide's calendar link after creating or deleting a workspace requires being online. While offline, a workspace can be optimistically created or deleted, but the client won't receive the updated Guide's calendar link value until coming back online.

QA Steps

  1. Create a new account
  2. Open the chat with Concierge
  3. Make sure you don't see the Phone 📞 icon in the top bar
  4. Create a workspace
  5. Close the left-hand panel, make sure the phone icon appears in the top bar of the Concierge chat (it can take a few seconds)
  6. Click the button, make sure it opens a new tab on a Google calendar appointment booking page (if not, make sure your popup blocker didn't get triggered). Close that page without booking an appointment
  7. Open your Workspace
  8. Click the "Get Assistance from our team" question mark icon in the top
    image
  9. Make sure you see a "Schedule a setup call" option on the page
    image
  10. Click the option, make sure it opens a new tab on a Google calendar appointment booking page
  11. Delete your workspace
  12. Go back to the Concierge chat, make sure the phone icon is no longer present
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
  • New account without guide + creation of a workspace showing a guide being assigned (for test purposes, the Guide's appointment booking page is simply google.com)

    Screen.Recording.2023-01-23.at.12.05.57.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-01-23.at.5.01.38.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-01-23.at.4.32.10.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-01-23.at.4.32.44.PM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-01-23.at.4.55.35.PM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-01-23.at.4.50.31.PM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-01-23.at.5.07.15.PM.mov

- Only show the Call button in the chat with Concierge for people eligible for Guide calls (i.e. have an guide assigned)
- When clicking the button, open the Guide's calendar appointment booking link instead of the call modal
@francoisl francoisl changed the title Only show call button in Concierge for eligible leads [HOLD Internal Web-E #36149] Only show call button in Concierge for eligible leads Jan 24, 2023
@francoisl francoisl changed the title [HOLD Internal Web-E #36149] Only show call button in Concierge for eligible leads [HOLD Internal Web-E #36149] Only show call button in Concierge and assistance page for eligible users Jan 24, 2023
@francoisl francoisl changed the title [HOLD Internal Web-E #36149] Only show call button in Concierge and assistance page for eligible users Only show call button in Concierge and assistance page for eligible users Jan 24, 2023
@francoisl francoisl marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 18:46
@francoisl francoisl requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2023 18:46
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from marcochavezf and sobitneupane and removed request for a team January 24, 2023 18:47
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 24, 2023

@sobitneupane @marcochavezf One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Followed QA steps and following are the results:

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-01-25.at.14.01.36.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-01-25.at.14.26.33.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-01-25.at.14.19.08.mov
Desktop
desktop_test.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-01-25.at.14.14.53.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-01-25.at.14.23.02.mov

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

When user is offline, even after deleting the workspace, phone icon is present in Concierge Chat. May be we can get rid of phone icon being optimistic. Just putting my thoughts to make sure it is an expected behavior.

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

When user is offline, even after deleting the workspace, phone icon is present in Concierge Chat. May be we can get rid of phone icon being optimistic. Just putting my thoughts to make sure it is an expected behavior.

Good point and thanks for bringing this up, but to clarify, if the user deletes a workspace, they might still be eligible to phone calls with their guide. All of that is determined in the backend based on whether the user is on a private domain with a guide assigned, or still admin on any other workspace/policy that have a guide. So to be safe, we should not optimistically get rid of the phone icon.

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok looks like we have all approvals, going to merge. Thanks for the review.

@francoisl francoisl merged commit ff9e01a into main Jan 27, 2023
@francoisl francoisl deleted the francois-guideCallButton branch January 27, 2023 21:27
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.2.62-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@mvtglobally
Copy link

@francoisl we are randomly seeing not seeing call option. How do we define if it's expected or potentially an issue? image
image

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll double-check. Can you let me know what account you were using please? If it was an expensifail.com or applause.expensifail.com, it's probably normal. It would be easiest to try with a new gmail account.

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

QAed internally with a new account on a Gmail address.

  • New account, call button is not present in the Concierge chat

Screenshot 2023-01-30 at 5 05 26 PM

  • After creating a Workspace and a Guide being invited, the call button appears

Screenshot 2023-01-30 at 5 06 02 PM

  • The "Schedule a setup call" option is visible in the Get Assistance menu

Screenshot 2023-01-30 at 5 06 19 PM

  • After deleting the workspace, the phone option disappears from the Concierge chat

Screenshot 2023-01-30 at 5 07 26 PM

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.2.62-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

@marcochavezf @francoisl Payment for C+ review is due.

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Working on it, thanks for your patience. (cc @arielgreen)

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

@francoisl @arielgreen Payment for C+ review is still due.

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm sorry about that, let me check internally what's up.

@arielgreen
Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane just sent an offer in Upwork -- once accepted, I'll issue payment.

@arielgreen
Copy link
Contributor

Paid.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants