-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use IOU/Expense reportID for IOU actions #18604
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
26 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
654574d
update delete and split requests
luacmartins d834c6e
update remaining commands
luacmartins 96e4d3c
Merge branch 'main' into cmartins-createRequestsInExpenseReports
luacmartins e7c0c06
resolve conflicts
luacmartins a0ae6e7
resolve conflicts
luacmartins 76a878c
Merge branch 'main' into cmartins-createRequestsInExpenseReports
luacmartins bc231dd
refactor requestMoney
luacmartins 7046f6b
update total
luacmartins 3a59bcd
refactor deleteMoneyRequest
luacmartins 7400977
create buildOnyxDataForMoneyRequest
luacmartins 6e7078d
fix requestMoneyTests
luacmartins f7f0025
fix some splitbill test
luacmartins 0463fee
fix splitBill success data
luacmartins 02458f6
fix tests
luacmartins 3056826
rm unused vars
luacmartins d3d17c1
get default participants
luacmartins c0f8f76
use defined var
luacmartins 4e13704
address some comments
luacmartins 85e7e5b
refactor splitBill and buildOnyxDataForMoneyRequest
luacmartins 7d180a2
address comments
luacmartins 706f5a0
pass params
luacmartins a935158
use same naming
luacmartins a16b722
resolve conflicts
luacmartins 3b7eb69
Merge branch 'main' into cmartins-createRequestsInExpenseReports
luacmartins 6a35364
update reportID
luacmartins 337707d
Merge branch 'main' into cmartins-createRequestsInExpenseReports
luacmartins File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@luacmartins Can you please explain why was this needed? We think this is causing this bug #19487
In case of a SPLIT action, the
requestReportID
is '0'. Building optimistic thread will not work as expected as theparentReportID
will be '0'.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should not be building a thread when clicking the preview on a Split action. We instead show a split details page that is being worked on here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it has to be for other cases, we should probably consider treating this a bit differntly for the split case, need to explore more there.