Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: don't focus on composer when open right modal #27155

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 13, 2023

Conversation

s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor

@s-alves10 s-alves10 commented Sep 11, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #26489
PROPOSAL: #26489 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open ND and log in with any account
  2. Open any chat
  3. Input @ character and verify that mention suggestions appears
  4. Tap + button again and tap any menu except Add attachment
  5. Verify that suggestion list doesn't appear for a brief moment before modal is opened
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Open ND and log in with any account
  2. Open any chat
  3. Input @ character and verify that mention suggestions appears
  4. Tap + button again and tap any menu except Add attachment
  5. Verify that suggestion list doesn't appear for a brief moment before modal is opened

QA Steps

  1. Open ND and log in with any account
  2. Open any chat
  3. Input @ character and verify that mention suggestions appears
  4. Tap + button again and tap any menu except Add attachment
  5. Verify that suggestion list doesn't appear for a brief moment before modal is opened
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
26489_mac_chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
26489_anroid_chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
26489_ios_safari.mp4
Desktop
26489_mac_desktop.mp4
iOS
26489_ios_native.mp4
Android
26489_android_native.mp4

@s-alves10 s-alves10 marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2023 14:58
@s-alves10 s-alves10 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2023 14:58
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from s77rt and removed request for a team September 11, 2023 14:59
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2023

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Comment on lines 185 to 189
// Restore the suggestions if onSelectionChange is not called on focused
if (isSelectionChangedOnFocus || !suggestionsRef.current) {
return;
}
suggestionsRef.current.restoreSuggestions();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is this for?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

onSelectionChange isn't called when composer gets focused(without any selection changes) on native platforms
In this case, we can restore the previous suggestion list. Previous suggestions are stored in resetSuggestions on blur handler

Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt Sep 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this still needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Without this, suggestions won't be shown unless selection is changed in native platforms. Refocusing or mouse clicking doesn't work.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 11, 2023

@s-alves10 The PR is slightly different than the approved solution. Please comment on each new section that was added explaining the need for it.

};

const isKeyboardVisibleWhenShowingModalRef = useRef(false);
const restoreKeyboardState = useCallback(() => {
if (!isKeyboardVisibleWhenShowingModalRef.current) {
if (!isKeyboardVisibleWhenShowingModalRef.current || !shouldFocusInputOnScreenFocus) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't need to set focus manually if focus is set automatically

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What problem is this solving?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have composer focused already if shouldFocusInputOnScreenFocus is true. In android chrome, onSelectionChange isn't called when we set focus again.
You can reproduce this with the following steps(Android chrome):

  1. Open any chat and input @ to show mentions list
  2. Click + button to open menu and tap outside of the menu to close it
  3. Verify that mention list doesn't show

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s-alves10 The PR is slightly different than the approved solution. Please comment on each new section that was added explaining the need for it.

I added some comments.
Suggestions, SuggestionEmojis, and SuggestionMentions have a new method: restoreSuggestions. This is created for restoring the previous suggestions.
We calculate the suggestions in onSelectionChange, but this is not called when gets refocused if there is no selection change. In this case, I restored the previous suggestions.

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt

Please take a look again

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 11, 2023

Added some comments on the previous review comments

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt

If you think we should limit the scope of the PR in the issue, please let me know.
We don't need restoreSuggestions in that case. I'll remove them

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 12, 2023

@s-alves10 Yes, let's please limit the PR to the bugs that are linked in the issue. If a bug is found and it's a regression we should fix it, but if it's on staging/main already it's better to report it in Slack otherwise we would be working out a new solution instead of going forward with the approved one (with the exception of some bugs where the solution is straightforward).

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

s-alves10 commented Sep 12, 2023

@s77rt

I removed all unrelated code. Also updated the test steps in PR description
Please check again

@@ -257,6 +261,7 @@ function AttachmentPickerWithMenuItems({
onClose={onPopoverMenuClose}
onItemSelected={(item, index) => {
setMenuVisibility(false);
onItemSelected();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we move this to be the last function call?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@s-alves10 s-alves10 Sep 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to overwrite isKeyboardVisibleWhenShowingModalRef.current value in triggerAttachmentPicker function when selecting Add attachment.
I think this is the ideal position this call should be placed at.
Is there any specific reason for moving?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you are right here.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 12, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mweb-chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
mweb-safari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from youssef-lr September 12, 2023 16:40
@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@youssef-lr

Please take a look

Copy link
Contributor

@youssef-lr youssef-lr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@youssef-lr youssef-lr merged commit 6b7ee90 into Expensify:main Sep 13, 2023
12 of 16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/youssef-lr in version: 1.3.69-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.69-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/youssef-lr in version: 1.3.70-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.3.70-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@s-alves10 s-alves10 deleted the fix/issue-26489 branch December 21, 2023 07:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants