Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CP Stag] Only use tab animation when in tab navigator #27974

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

Li357
Copy link
Contributor

@Li357 Li357 commented Sep 22, 2023

Details

Deploy blocker. Replace Receipt crashes because the Receipt Selector is not within the tab navigator because we open it up from the three dots in the modal.

Fixed Issues

$ #27903

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA steps, should work offline

QA Steps

  1. Launch App
  2. Request money via Scan option
  3. Tap the report preview
  4. Tap the request preview
  5. Tap the receipt image
  6. When the modal opens, tap the three dot menu at the top
  7. Select replace
  8. Verify it does not crash and lets you select a new image
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

change only applies to mobile native

Web

Uploading Screen Recording 2023-33309-22 at 6.50.33 PM.mov…

Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari

Uploading Simulator Screen Recording - iPhone 14 (16.1) - 2023-09-22 at 18.56.19.mp4…

Desktop

Uploading Screen Recording 34232023-09-22 at 7.08.17 PM.mov…

iOS
Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.14.16.1.-.2023-09-22.at.10.33.11.mp4
Android

@Li357 Li357 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2023 02:48
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from eVoloshchak and removed request for a team September 22, 2023 02:48
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 22, 2023

@eVoloshchak Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Li357
Copy link
Contributor Author

Li357 commented Sep 22, 2023

@eVoloshchak My Android emulator camera won't load. Any way you could test this for me?

@Li357 Li357 self-assigned this Sep 22, 2023
@thienlnam thienlnam requested review from parasharrajat and removed request for eVoloshchak September 22, 2023 07:06
const tabPositionAnimation = useTabAnimation();
// We can use a condition to call a hook here because otherwise the hook throws
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/rules-of-hooks
const tabPositionAnimation = isInTabNavigator ? useTabAnimation() : null;
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Sep 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

while this may be working, it is not the correct way of using hooks. An alternative would be to create two screens. One for direct access and one for in-tab selector. Define these in routes.

  1. Now create a common component from the screen logic.
  2. use this component on both screens.
  3. pass prop to manage if we want to use navigationAwareCamera with TabNavigation or a similar component without tab navigation.
  4. We will create two components for navigationAwareCamera, one with tabAnimation hook and the other without it. These are used in step 3.
  5. For the Replace button, we will navigate to the direct screen. Not in the tab selector.

  1. We can also update the patch to skip throwing errors and just issue a console warning.
  2. But this is more error-prone as users might use it in the wrong place.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer the second option. Creating that much boilerplate just for not calling a hook conditionally isn't worth it IMO.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, I checked and it seems 1-2 are already done in the code. We only need to do 3-4.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The main component used is ReceiptSelector. So we can create a prop on it saying hasTab or something and then just switch between the two versions of navigationAwareCamera component.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I won't recommend the second option has it will lead to the same issue which we prevented by throwing the error. We want to prevent he user from using this hook in non tab screens.

@@ -19,12 +19,19 @@ function NavigationAwareCamera({cameraTabIndex, forwardedRef, ...props}) {
const navigation = useNavigation();
const [isCameraActive, setIsCameraActive] = useState(navigation.isFocused());

const isInTabNavigator = cameraTabIndex > -1;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a workaround to detect if we are in a tab.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, but I don't know I prefer isTab or something similar to proposal 2. What do you think?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even if we use proposal 2 is comes down to conditional use of hook.


useEffect(() => {
if (!isInTabNavigator) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We skipped this hook, did you check if the camera is opening?

I think we will have to add a different hook to activate the camera when not inside Tab Selector.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Sep 22, 2023

There is a prop warning. Let's fix that. Please add the test videos for other platforms too.

@Li357
Copy link
Contributor Author

Li357 commented Sep 22, 2023

Done for all except android. Still having trouble with chrome and native there. Let me know if you have better luck

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

So, I think there is a slight delay before the camera opens on the replacement screen. This is something we solved with useTabAnimation hook on the Scan page. I think we can try listening to transitionStart event here on the Replace screen. I am trying this ATM.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

So I don't see much difference. I think we are good.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Sep 22, 2023

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.5.54.51.PM.mov

🔲 iOS / Safari

Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.5.37.48.PM.mov

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.5.42.45.PM.mov

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.5.41.58.PM.mov

🔲 Android / Chrome

Screenrecorder-2023-09-22-17-21-30-118.mp4

🔲 Android / native

Screenrecorder-2023-09-22-17-16-12-490.mp4
Screenrecorder-2023-09-22-17-16-51-460.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Okay, so the replace page is not opening on Safari and the web.

Screen.Recording.2023-09-22.at.5.26.10.PM.mov

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

So this issue is also present on main, we can skip this bug on this PR.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 22, 2023

@jasperhuangg Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@thienlnam thienlnam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks great - thank you both so much!

@thienlnam thienlnam changed the title Only use tab animation when in tab navigator [CP Stag] Only use tab animation when in tab navigator Sep 22, 2023
@thienlnam thienlnam merged commit 3d3e791 into main Sep 22, 2023
17 checks passed
@thienlnam thienlnam deleted the andrewli-fixreceiptcrash branch September 22, 2023 12:27
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.3.72-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.3.72-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.3.74-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 1.3.74-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants