Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS migration] Migrate 'Onfido' component to TypeScript #31378

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor

@VickyStash VickyStash commented Nov 15, 2023

Details

[TS migration] Migrate 'Onfido' component to TypeScript

Fixed Issues

$ #25136
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Settings -> Workspaces
  3. Open a Workspace without Bank Account -> Open Bank Account section
  4. Tap on Connect manually
  5. Enter routing/account number (ex: 011401533 / 1111222233331111) -> Next | Confirm
  6. Fill in the data in the Step 2 and confirm
  7. You should be navigated to the new page, and the Onfido process should start properly. Make sure the screen looks the same way as before.

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Open the app
  2. Go to Settings -> Workspaces
  3. Open a Workspace without Bank Account -> Open Bank Account section
  4. Start to connect bank account
  5. Follow the flow until you get the Onfido verification.
  6. Complete the Onfido verification and make sure it works the same way as before.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android1.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_web1.mp4
iOS: Native
ios1.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_web1.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web1.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop1.mp4

@@ -59,11 +63,10 @@ function initializeOnfido({sdkToken, onSuccess, onError, onUserExit, preferredLo
{
type: CONST.ONFIDO.TYPE.DOCUMENT,
options: {
useLiveDocumentCapture: true,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was removed from lib some time ago https://documentation.onfido.com/sdk/web/#no--1100

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, but we should make sure isn't being used in Onfido SDK, because it can be an issue with TS typings but not the code itself.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From what I understood it was deprecated in 10.1.10, but we are at 8.3.0.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fabioh8010 8.3.0. is a version of @onfido/react-native-sdk which is used by mobile platforms.
The version of onfido-sdk-ui used by E/App for web is 13.1.0, so it's deprecated.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for explanation @VickyStash !

forceCrossDevice: true,
hideCountrySelection: true,
country: 'USA',
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This param wasn't found by TS

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, but we should make sure isn't being used in Onfido SDK, because it can be an issue with TS typings but not the code itself.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since I don't have access to the source code it's hard to say if it's used. But based on the docs you can pass country to specific document, which is done here.

@@ -78,17 +81,15 @@ function initializeOnfido({sdkToken, onSuccess, onError, onUserExit, preferredLo
},
},
],
smsNumberCountryCode: CONST.ONFIDO.SMS_NUMBER_COUNTRY_CODE.US,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't have CONST.ONFIDO.SMS_NUMBER_COUNTRY_CODE.US, we have only CONST.ONFIDO.SMS_NUMBER_COUNTRY_CODE, so all this time the undefined was used

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and what about showCountrySelection?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@VickyStash VickyStash Nov 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

showCountrySelection was removed between 8.1.1 and 8.2.0 web sdk versions
image

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ohh right, thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this file isn't necessary anymore, the issue it mentioned is resolved.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's test it to ensure no regressions are created!

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Hey hey! We are refactoring the bank account flow it would be helpful not to do TS migrations on the BA flows until the refactor is done. I am putting thi PR on hold for now, you can see the progress of the refactor in this branch #31456

@mountiny mountiny changed the title [TS migration] Migrate 'Onfido' component to TypeScript [HOLD] [TS migration] Migrate 'Onfido' component to TypeScript Nov 16, 2023
@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

Let's also address this comment in this PR 🙏

@blazejkustra blazejkustra mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2024
50 tasks
@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny Could you please confirm, this issue is unblocked now, right?

@mountiny mountiny changed the title [HOLD] [TS migration] Migrate 'Onfido' component to TypeScript [TS migration] Migrate 'Onfido' component to TypeScript Feb 20, 2024
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Yep unblocked

# Conflicts:
#	src/components/Onfido/BaseOnfidoWeb.tsx
#	src/components/Onfido/index.native.tsx
const {translate} = useLocalize();

useEffect(() => {
OnfidoSDK.start({
sdkToken,
theme: OnfidoTheme.AUTOMATIC,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

theme is a required prop in OnfidoSDK.start config. I've checked the docs and OnfidoTheme.AUTOMATIC is a default value, so I've added theme prop with a default value.

@@ -46,7 +57,6 @@ function initializeOnfido({sdkToken, onSuccess, onError, onUserExit, preferredLo
colorBorderLinkUnderline: theme.link,
colorBackgroundLinkHover: theme.link,
colorBackgroundLinkActive: theme.link,
authAccentColor: theme.link,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This param wasn't found by TS, I haven't found it in lib/docs as well.
Onfido SDK source code is not is not publicly available to check this param there, but I can see the last version this params was mentioned in Onfido docs is 10.1.0, after that it wasn't there anymore.

@VickyStash VickyStash marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2024 10:28
@VickyStash VickyStash requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2024 10:28
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Santhosh-Sellavel and removed request for a team February 27, 2024 10:28
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 27, 2024

@Santhosh-Sellavel Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel kind bump 🙂

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I am unable to build the iOS App due to Xcode updates. Waiting on that...

@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor Author

@parasharrajat hey, any updates here? 🙂

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Still stuck with the error. May be you can help me bypass this issue? https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1709832511575249

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@VickyStash Could you please merge the main and fix conflicts? The issue fixed on main.

# Conflicts:
#	src/components/Onfido/BaseOnfidoWeb.tsx
@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor Author

@parasharrajat I've started to check functionality on main branch and noticed some UI issues. I'm waiting for the response if it's something expected.

@@ -46,7 +57,6 @@ function initializeOnfido({sdkToken, onSuccess, onError, onUserExit, preferredLo
colorBorderLinkUnderline: theme.link,
colorBackgroundLinkHover: theme.link,
colorBackgroundLinkActive: theme.link,
authAccentColor: theme.link,
colorBackgroundInfoPill: theme.link,
colorBackgroundSelector: theme.appBG,
colorBackgroundDocTypeButton: theme.success,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
colorBackgroundDocTypeButton: theme.success,
colorBackgroundDocTypeButton: theme.success,
borderWidthSurfaceModal: '0px',

@VickyStash Could you help to add borderWidthSurfaceModal property to hide the black border (more information here)

@VickyStash
Copy link
Contributor Author

@parasharrajat I've resolved conflicts, please take a look!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Sure. Thanks.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Mar 14, 2024

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

Screen.Recording.2024-03-15.at.12.22.04.AM.mov

🔲 iOS / Safari

RPReplay_Final1710443047.mov

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-03-07.at.5.02.40.PM.mov

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-03-07.at.4.57.19.PM.mov

🔲 Android / Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-03-15.at.12.20.18.AM.mov

🔲 Android / native

Screen.Recording.2024-03-15.at.12.14.27.AM.mov

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 14, 2024

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #25136 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from bondydaa March 14, 2024 19:09
@bondydaa bondydaa merged commit 8b54aff into Expensify:main Mar 15, 2024
17 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Mar 15, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Mar 15, 2024

@bondydaa looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@bondydaa
Copy link
Contributor

bondydaa commented Mar 15, 2024

I see all tests as passing, Melvin you're drunk.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/bondydaa in version: 1.4.54-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.4.54-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants