Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add useStyleUtils hook #32498

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

chrispader
Copy link
Contributor

@chrispader chrispader commented Dec 5, 2023

@grgia

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #32472
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Build the app and test on all platforms that there are no errors. Switch to light mode, and repeat.

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

No QA.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@chrispader chrispader changed the title useThemeStyleUtils hook Add useThemeStyleUtils hook Dec 5, 2023
@chrispader chrispader marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2023 17:57
@chrispader chrispader requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2023 17:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from allroundexperts and removed request for a team December 5, 2023 17:57
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 5, 2023

@allroundexperts Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

contributingGuides/TS_STYLE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contributingGuides/TS_STYLE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AddressSearch/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@chrispader chrispader changed the title Add useThemeStyleUtils hook Add useStyleUtils hook Dec 5, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia grgia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add to the description why we're making this change.
For Tests, we can add something like "build the app and test on all platforms that there are no errors. Switch to light mode, and repeat"
For QA can you add something like "NO QA- this PR can be tested through normal regression testing for style-based regressions"

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Dec 6, 2023

@allroundexperts are you able to prioritize this checklist today?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts are you able to prioritize this checklist today?

Yes. This is catching conflicts like 🔥

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts Can you just provide Android screenshots?

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

Sure!

@chrispader
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still seeing conflicts 😄

resolved again

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra

Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.9.56.32.PM.mov

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshot 2023-12-07 at 10 46 57 PM

@chrispader Color of split button is getting diluted to background

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Dec 7, 2023

@shubham1206agra I'll handle that in a follow up! #32688

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Dec 7, 2023

@shubham1206agra can we complete the review here?

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Screenshot 2023-12-07 at 11 11 38 PM

NAB - Desktop giving CORS on Images query

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Dec 7, 2023

@shubham1206agra I think the CORS are unrelated

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Dec 7, 2023

Screenshot 2023-12-07 at 11 48 13 PM

I was able to switch theme once. Switching theme again gives this error

Code used

useEffect(() => {
        // eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/prefer-actions-set-data
        Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.PREFERRED_THEME, 'light'); // Adapt to "dark" if needed
    }, []);

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Dec 7, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

#32498 (comment)

Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.11.34.22.PM.mp4
Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.11.27.00.PM.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.10.55.01.PM.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.10.41.46.PM.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.11.12.55.PM.mp4

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Dec 7, 2023

@chrispader Please fix this #32498 (comment) so that I can approve this PR

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good except one comment from @shubham1206agra!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from grgia December 7, 2023 18:39
@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Dec 7, 2023

@shubham1206agra is this platform specific? I am unable to replicate
#32498 (comment)

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra is this platform specific? I am unable to replicate #32498 (comment)

This was on iOS native. Let me confirm this on web too.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra is this platform specific? I am unable to replicate #32498 (comment)

@grgia Please ignore this

@grgia grgia merged commit 04f273b into Expensify:main Dec 7, 2023
19 of 20 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 7, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 8, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/grgia in version: 1.4.10-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 8, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/grgia in version: 1.4.10-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.10-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.10-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

},
};
modalContainerStyle = {
borderRadius: 12,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not using the correct radius value of componentBorderRadiusLarge i.e. 16 instead of 12 caused #42716

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants