Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workspace description #36058

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

esh-g
Copy link
Contributor

@esh-g esh-g commented Feb 7, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #32955
PROPOSAL: #32955 (comment)

Tests

  1. Make a workspace.
  2. Go to workspace profile and add a description.
  3. Go to the policy expense chat
  4. Make sure the added description is shown both in header and chat mast head.
  5. Make sure clicking on the header description or chat mast head description leads us to description edit page.
  6. Make sure the #admins room has the updated description report action.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Go offline.
  2. Go to a workspace profile page
  3. Add/edit the description for the workspace.
  4. Make sure the option gets greyed out.
  5. Go online.
  6. Make sure the description change persists.

QA Steps

  1. Make a workspace.
  2. Go to workspace profile and add a description.
  3. Go to the policy expense chat
  4. Make sure the added description is shown both in header and chat mast head.
  5. Make sure clicking on the header description or chat mast head description leads us to description edit page.
  6. Make sure the #admins room has the updated description report action.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-02-11.at.5.23.33.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-02-08.at.7.56.41.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-02-13.at.6.14.14.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-02-08.at.7.51.23.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-02-08.at.7.42.35.PM.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-02-11.at.5.32.53.PM.mov

@esh-g esh-g requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2024 18:41
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from jjcoffee and removed request for a team February 7, 2024 18:41
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 7, 2024

@jjcoffee Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Feb 8, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-native-2024-02-09_11.20.38.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-chrome-2024-02-09_11.27.11.mp4
iOS: Native
ios-native-2024-02-09_10.53.47.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-safari-2024-02-09_10.46.29.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
desktop-chrome-2024-02-09_10.35.59.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-app-2024-02-09_10.38.02.mp4

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Feb 8, 2024

Sure, thanks for reminding me!

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Feb 8, 2024

@jjcoffee We show the report details page when the user clicks on report description without permission... So, I thought to be consistent in that case.

  • For header, I think it makes sense because it helps you see the whole description, which might not be visible from mast head when it is a long chat.
  • Let me know if we want to do nothing on click on masthead if user doesn't have permission.

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Feb 8, 2024

@jjcoffee Sure, I agree it feels a little jarring... I'll go ahead with what gets decided. Make sure to raise this in slack in here: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1706584967766219 for a quicker response...

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Feb 8, 2024

@esh-g Ah thanks I'd missed that Slack convo! Could you also add offline feedback for changing the workspace description?

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

@@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ function WorkspaceOverviewPage({policy, currencyList, route}) {
disabled={readOnly}
disabledStyle={styles.cursorDefault}
/>
<OfflineWithFeedback pendingAction={lodashGet(policy, 'pendingFields.generalSettings')}>
<OfflineWithFeedback pendingAction={pendingAction}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it makes more sense to wrap each MenuItemWithTopDescription with a separate OfflineWithFeedback, otherwise we grey out all the items even if only one has changed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jjcoffee The problem is that the name and currency are under generalSettings and grouped together while description has different API endpoint. This means that if we have separate OfflineWithFeedback, we would see that upon editing the name, the currency would also get greyed out while the description in between them would not. I think the solution to this is to break up name and currency into separate endpoints, but I think that could be out of scope for the issue. Please let me know what you think!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commented on Slack too. I think it makes sense to separate it out as it's as separate API command. Once a followup deals with it, the other two fields will update separately too.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Feb 9, 2024

@esh-g Could you also add missing screenshots please?

@jjcoffee

This comment was marked as resolved.

src/languages/en.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

jjcoffee commented Feb 9, 2024

BUG: Android Native: The description text input doesn't immediately render at the correct size. We could fix this on a followup if it's out of scope, e.g. if it's a general issue:

android-native-flicker-2024-02-09_13.41.32.mp4

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

Is it fine if we show this cursor? I'm basically disabling the PressableWithFeedback

I'd say it's best with just the normal cursor rather than showing it as disabled. There's no need for visual feedback since it's completely unclickable and the user wouldn't know what it being disabled would mean.

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

Moreover, I have a question. Should we display the empty description item if the user doesn't have permission to edit?

Hmm good question! I think hiding it in this case makes sense.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Feb 13, 2024

@jjcoffee I pushed solutions for both of those. Please confirm and hopefully then we can get this approved

@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@esh-g Can you do the same tweak for the header's cursor for non-admins? Or ideally it would behave the same as when there is no description where tapping it opens the Details panel. No worries if that's too complex though.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Feb 13, 2024

@jjcoffee For the header, as a whole it is wrapped in a pressable so the cursor would still be the pointer for admin and non-admin, just clicking on the description won't do anything for non-admin. I have been trying to somehow bypass the touch of the child pressable so that the touch is passed to parent in case of non-admin but I'm not finding a method to do that... I've tried disabling pointerEvents but that doesn't work. Let me know if this is worth putting in more effort.

esh-g and others added 2 commits February 13, 2024 19:27
Co-authored-by: Joel Davies <joeld.dev@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@jjcoffee jjcoffee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from puneetlath February 13, 2024 14:05
@jjcoffee
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath Just wanted to flag a few issues that haven't been fixed here.

  • Bug: Android Native: The description text input doesn't immediately render at the correct size. - we decided this is most likely unrelated to this PR and should be fixed either separately or on a followup.
  • Bug: Sign out and sign in again, open a workspace chat with a description set. The chat initially shows "Workspace chat" before the actual description loads. (I couldn't replicate the same thing for room descriptions). - this seems like a BE issue
  • Bug: refreshing after navigating to the settings page to edit the description will display the chat in the background, rather than the settings page. - we've agreed on Slack that this shouldn't be a blocker (I believe this should be fixed at some point though!)

puneetlath
puneetlath previously approved these changes Feb 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@puneetlath puneetlath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job with this. Seems to test well.

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Unfortunately some conflicts came before I could review. If you can fix them, I'll merge first thing in my morning.

@esh-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

esh-g commented Feb 14, 2024

@puneetlath Fixed it! Hope we can merge this before any more conflicts arise

@puneetlath puneetlath merged commit fc37aeb into Expensify:main Feb 14, 2024
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.4.42-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 1.4.42-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

<PressableWithoutFeedback
onPress={() => {
if (ReportUtils.canEditPolicyDescription(props.policy)) {
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.WORKSPACE_DESCRIPTION.getRoute(props.report.policyID));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line created a regression. Issue here #36991

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants