Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/address page state navigation 2 #36770

Merged
merged 75 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

ygshbht
Copy link
Contributor

@ygshbht ygshbht commented Feb 18, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #23725
PROPOSAL: #23725 (comment)

Tests

Verify for places where you have to select an American State from a list:

For Personal Address:

  1. Go to Profile > Address > State (with US as country)
  2. Click back button of device
  3. Notice it Properly navigates to Home address screen

For debit card page:

  1. Go to /settings/wallet/add-debit-card or /send/new/add-debit-card > State
  2. Click back button of device
  3. Notice it properly navigates to Debit card screen

For ReimbusementAccountPage

  1. Select a Workspace > Settings > Bank Account
  2. Verify for all State Selectors you see in the flow (e.g Company Address, Incorporation State, etc.)
    1. Click back button of device when in respective StateSelectionPages
    1. Notice it properly navigates to previous screen
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as tests

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
output_web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
output_android.chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
output_ios.safari.mp4
Desktop
output_desktop.mp4
iOS
output_ios.mp4
Android
trimmed_output_android.mp4

ygshbht and others added 27 commits October 7, 2023 12:53
Co-authored-by: Rajat Parashar <parasharrajat@users.noreply.github.com>
@ygshbht ygshbht requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2024 07:41
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team February 18, 2024 07:41
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 18, 2024

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@mountiny Could you please help us decide the next steps here?

@ygshbht
Copy link
Contributor Author

ygshbht commented Mar 23, 2024

@parasharrajat When you used StateSelector, and didnt select any country, it didnt show any error, which i have fixed through this 2619a29 commit following the same logic as CountrySelector, like it is production. I have also refactored the code in StateSelector by removing the local state (react state) for the state (geographical state)

@ygshbht
Copy link
Contributor Author

ygshbht commented Mar 25, 2024

@parasharrajat, I have been studying various parts of the repository to address the problems and merge this long-standing issue as soon as possible. As demonstrated in the video, a similar page, PronounPage, which also utilizes SelectionList, exhibits the same issue when I make those unrelated edits. From my observation, SelectionList attempts to match the scroll position of the previous SelectionList. Thus, in instances where you select United States, which is located towards the bottom of the CountrySelector list of 150 items (not using the search input, as it shortens the list), and then attempt to use StateSelector (with about 50 states), the list scrolls to the bottom, showing the last states (or directly errors out if shouldUseDynamicMaxToRenderPerBatch is also used). Therefore, if you mimic the PronounPage solution by simply adding an empty View, it resolves our problem without introducing side effects.

profilepage.mp4

@ygshbht
Copy link
Contributor Author

ygshbht commented Mar 25, 2024

@parasharrajat I have pushed the patch in 4efccc0.

patch.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I will test it.

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry I was ooo, I think that the latest comment suggests @ygshbht found a solution to this issue. @parasharrajat can you please test if that is working as expected tomorrow? thank you!

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@ygshbht Can you please resolve conflicts?

@parasharrajat can you conclude the testing please?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Testing in 40 mins.

Comment on lines 52 to 74
useEffect(() => {
if (isFocused && didOpenStateSelector.current) {
didOpenStateSelector.current = false;
if (!stateFromUrl) {
onBlur?.();
}
}

if (!stateFromUrl) {
return;
}

// This will cause the form to revalidate and remove any error related to country name
if (onInputChange) {
onInputChange(stateFromUrl);
}

Navigation.setParams({state: undefined});

// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, [stateFromUrl, onBlur, isFocused]);

const title = stateCode && Object.keys(COMMON_CONST.STATES).includes(stateCode) ? translate(`allStates.${stateCode}.stateName`) : '';
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Mar 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am trying to understand the usages of state from URL stateFromUrl and state as a direct prop stateCode.

Here the title is calculated form the stateCode from prop value. What about the value that is coming from URL? We are dependent on onInputChange to pass back the URL value as prop. What if this component is not used in the Form and we don't have onInputChange handler which updates the prop value. Will this component work?

If this is the case, we are creating an incomplete error-prone component.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it won't work if not used within form. But I suppose since it in an input component, it will always be used inside a form. Do you want it to be more independent, generic, futureproof, and have its own state?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently it is not used without a Form and If it is used as a standalone component, it can always be wrapped around a Form like IncorporationStateBusiness. Or the devs can modify the code as per their needs. For current uses and its intended purpose, do you think it still needs a local state?
image

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Current StatePicker too doesnt have local state. Since we're just mimicking its functionality, do you still think we need to worry about local state?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I am fine with its current state and it can be modified later if needed. But let's add explanatory comments to the logic above to explain what's going on in the effect and how this component is working.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ygshbht ygshbht Mar 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, done.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

Screen.Recording.2024-04-01.at.3.46.20.PM.mov

🔲 iOS / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-04-01.at.3.48.49.PM.mov

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-04-01.at.3.42.14.PM.mov

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-04-01.at.3.39.46.PM.mov

🔲 Android / Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-04-01.at.3.58.33.PM.mov

🔲 Android / native

Screen.Recording.2024-04-01.at.3.52.20.PM.mov

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny April 1, 2024 10:32
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@mountiny Ready for review.

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Been a long journey, I wont hold this for longer, thank you very much for pushing this ahead

/** Callback to call when the picker modal is dismissed */
onBlur?: () => void;

/** object to get route details from */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB

Suggested change
/** object to get route details from */
/** Object to get route details from */

if (navigation.getState()?.routes.length === 1) {
// If this is the only page in the navigation stack (examples include direct navigation to this page via URL or page reload).
if (_.isEmpty(backTo)) {
// No "backTo": default back navigation.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: I think some of these comments might not have been needed

Suggested change
// No "backTo": default back navigation.

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Apr 2, 2024

Thank you for patience and good work @ygshbht @parasharrajat 🙌

@mountiny mountiny merged commit ed59db2 into Expensify:main Apr 2, 2024
19 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Apr 8, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.60-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants