Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: ws options available from all devices for same user #42008

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

Fix: ws options available from all devices for same user #42008

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
adf4099
Fix: ws options available from all devices for same user
dragnoir May 10, 2024
b5d94a9
Merge branch 'Expensify:main' into 40686-fix
dragnoir May 20, 2024
16145e9
revert isPolicyAdmin
dragnoir May 20, 2024
67e0f08
fix policyUtility
dragnoir May 20, 2024
7eaeda0
fix role not available
dragnoir May 20, 2024
9ec30ac
fix admin when not on policy
dragnoir May 20, 2024
349b220
move employe check into isPolicyAdmin
dragnoir May 22, 2024
64a9e26
better approach
dragnoir May 22, 2024
1aeaaee
fix lint
dragnoir May 22, 2024
799d626
Merge branch 'Expensify:main' into 40686-fix
dragnoir May 25, 2024
f0b1770
Merge branch 'Expensify:main' into 40686-fix
dragnoir May 30, 2024
2f349db
same logic for AccessOrNotFoundWrapper
dragnoir May 30, 2024
f9e0e16
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into 40686-fix
dragnoir May 30, 2024
ca4d45f
fix ts
dragnoir May 30, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/libs/PolicyUtils.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ function isExpensifyTeam(email: string | undefined): boolean {
/**
* Checks if the current user is an admin of the policy.
*/
const isPolicyAdmin = (policy: OnyxEntry<Policy> | EmptyObject): boolean => policy?.role === CONST.POLICY.ROLE.ADMIN;

const isPolicyAdmin = (policy: OnyxEntry<Policy> | EmptyObject): boolean =>
policy?.role === CONST.POLICY.ROLE.ADMIN || policy?.employeeList?.[policy?.owner]?.role === CONST.POLICY.ROLE.ADMIN;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should check the role of the current user accountID here. Or it'll introduce regression - non-admin members can also see protected items.

Screen.Recording.2024-05-13.at.8.38.33.PM.mov

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the note. Working on it..

/**
* Checks if the policy is a free group policy.
*/
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/pages/workspace/WorkspaceInitialPage.tsx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ function WorkspaceInitialPage({policyDraft, policy: policyProp, reimbursementAcc
const hasMembersError = PolicyUtils.hasEmployeeListError(policy);
const hasPolicyCategoryError = PolicyUtils.hasPolicyCategoriesError(policyCategories);
const hasGeneralSettingsError = !isEmptyObject(policy?.errorFields?.generalSettings ?? {}) || !isEmptyObject(policy?.errorFields?.avatarURL ?? {});
const shouldShowProtectedItems = PolicyUtils.isPolicyAdmin(policy);
const shouldShowProtectedItems = PolicyUtils.isPolicyAdmin(policyProp);
const isPaidGroupPolicy = PolicyUtils.isPaidGroupPolicy(policy);
const isFreeGroupPolicy = PolicyUtils.isFreeGroupPolicy(policy);
const [featureStates, setFeatureStates] = useState(policyFeatureStates);
Expand Down
Loading