Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Payment card / Subscription] Implement “Subscription details” section (UI) #42975

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor

@JKobrynski JKobrynski commented Jun 3, 2024

Details

To access this newly created component, paste the following link into the browser

https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082/settings/subscription

or add this effect to InitialSettingsPage.tsx

useEffect(() => {
    Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SETTINGS_SUBSCRIPTION)
}, [])

Fixed Issues

$ #38623
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Prerequisites

To test this component you are going to need a Collect workspace or a Control workspace. To create either one go to https://staging.expensify.com and then to Settings -> Workspaces and click the New Workspace button. In the next step you can create a Collect/Control workspace, that will be available in new dot (on the same account) after login.

  1. Log into the app using an account that has a Collect/Control workspace
  2. Navigate to the Subscription Settings page (see Details section above for instructions)
  3. Verify the Subscription details section of the screen
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as Tests section above

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

android-annual-usercount
android-payperuse
android-annual_nousercount
android-expapproved

Android: mWeb Chrome

chrome-expapproved
chrome-payperuse
chrome-annual_usercount
chrome-annual_nousercount

iOS: Native

ios-payperuse
ios-expapproved
ios-annual_nousercount
ios-annual_usercount

iOS: mWeb Safari

safari-annual_nousercount
safari-annual_payperuse
safari-annual_usercount
safari-expapproved

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

web-annual_usercount
web-expapproved
web-annual_nousercount
web-payperuse

MacOS: Desktop

desktop-annual_nousercount
desktop-annual_usercount
desktop-payperuse
desktop-expapproved

src/components/OptionsPicker/OptionItem.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/OptionsPicker/OptionItem.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/OptionsPicker/index.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/OptionsPicker/index.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/API/types.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left comments.

src/components/OptionsPicker/OptionItem.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/OptionsPicker/index.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabioh8010 @VickyStash @rezkiy37 PR updated! I think I addressed everything

@JKobrynski JKobrynski marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2024 16:45
@JKobrynski JKobrynski requested review from a team as code owners June 3, 2024 16:45
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from amyevans and removed request for a team and VickyStash June 3, 2024 16:45
@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Jun 4, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android_Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

Android_Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS_Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

iOS_Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS_Chrome

MacOS: Desktop

MacOS_Desktop

Copy link
Contributor

@Ollyws Ollyws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

I believe the corner radius here should be 8px, but it looks 4px to me?

CleanShot 2024-06-04 at 20 05 33@2x

@dubielzyk-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

These checkmarks look 20x20px (see below), but should be 16x16px according to the Figma file.

CleanShot 2024-06-04 at 20 06 22@2x

Let me know if I'm wrong btw 😄 A bit hard to judge some of this stuff

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dubielzyk-expensify the border radius was 6px - in between 😄 The icons were indeed 20px, I changed them to 16x16, good catch!

Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 15 11 51
Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 15 11 38

src/styles/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
amyevans
amyevans previously approved these changes Jun 4, 2024
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Can we see this screenshot but in light mode?
image

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton

Screenshot 2024-06-04 at 18 05 08

Good catch again, it's the wrong logo, can you send me a file with the light theme version of ExpensifyApproved?

Copy link
Contributor

@amyevans amyevans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Light logo change looks good! 🚀

@amyevans amyevans merged commit 1fcd788 into Expensify:main Jun 4, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 4, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.


const [privateSubscription] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_PRIVATE_SUBSCRIPTION);
const [account] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.ACCOUNT);
const [preferredTheme] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.PREFERRED_THEME);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you use useOnyx directly here instead of useTheme? Theme context would probably be more performant in general, plus it's just more consistent across the codebase.

{!!account?.isApprovedAccountant || !!account?.isApprovedAccountantClient ? (
<View style={[styles.borderedContentCard, styles.p5, styles.mt5]}>
<Icon
src={Illustrations.ExpensifyApprovedLogo}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't you forget to update this based on the theme?

Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, actually @JKobrynski can you please create a follow-up PR to use themed illustrations and the useThemeIllustrations hook for the ExpensifyApproved logo? see https://github.com/Expensify/App/tree/32f176fe7734c27ee0b8e0256e8a8fd5a6ac237d/src/styles/theme/illustrations

feel free to tag me on the review

@amyevans
Copy link
Contributor

amyevans commented Jun 7, 2024

@roryabraham @JKobrynski I moved it to a new GH so it doesn't get lost forever: #43306

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.81-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.