Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor IOU.categorizeTrackedExpense function #52221

Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
115 changes: 58 additions & 57 deletions src/libs/actions/IOU.ts
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -112,7 +112,33 @@ type TrackExpenseInformation = {
actionableWhisperReportActionIDParam?: string;
onyxData: OnyxData;
};

type CategorizeTrackedExpenseInformation = {
policyID: string;
transactionID: string;
moneyRequestPreviewReportActionID: string;
moneyRequestReportID: string;
moneyRequestCreatedReportActionID: string;
actionableWhisperReportActionID: string;
linkedTrackedExpenseReportAction: OnyxTypes.ReportAction;
linkedTrackedExpenseReportID: string;
transactionThreadReportID: string;
reportPreviewReportActionID: string;
onyxData: OnyxData | undefined;
isDraftPolicy: boolean;
};
type CategorizeTrackedExpenseTransactionParams = {
amount: number;
currency: string;
comment: string;
merchant: string;
created: string;
taxCode: string;
taxAmount: number;
category?: string;
tag?: string;
billable?: boolean;
receipt?: Receipt;
};
type SendInvoiceInformation = {
senderWorkspaceID: string;
receiver: Partial<OnyxTypes.PersonalDetails>;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3453,31 +3479,20 @@ function convertTrackedExpenseToRequest(
}

function categorizeTrackedExpense(
policyID: string,
transactionID: string,
moneyRequestPreviewReportActionID: string,
moneyRequestReportID: string,
moneyRequestCreatedReportActionID: string,
actionableWhisperReportActionID: string,
linkedTrackedExpenseReportAction: OnyxTypes.ReportAction,
linkedTrackedExpenseReportID: string,
transactionThreadReportID: string,
reportPreviewReportActionID: string,
onyxData: OnyxData | undefined,
amount: number,
currency: string,
comment: string,
merchant: string,
created: string,
isDraftPolicy: boolean,
category?: string,
tag?: string,
taxCode = '',
taxAmount = 0,
billable?: boolean,
receipt?: Receipt,
trackedExpenseInformation: CategorizeTrackedExpenseInformation,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you create the type that contains all params? We already discussed it in #52231 (comment)

transactionParams: CategorizeTrackedExpenseTransactionParams,
createdWorkspaceParams?: CreateWorkspaceParams,
) {
const {
transactionID,
moneyRequestReportID,
actionableWhisperReportActionID,
linkedTrackedExpenseReportAction,
linkedTrackedExpenseReportID,
transactionThreadReportID,
onyxData,
isDraftPolicy,
} = trackedExpenseInformation;
const {optimisticData, successData, failureData} = onyxData ?? {};

const {
Expand All @@ -3498,27 +3513,10 @@ function categorizeTrackedExpense(
optimisticData?.push(...moveTransactionOptimisticData);
successData?.push(...moveTransactionSuccessData);
failureData?.push(...moveTransactionFailureData);

const parameters = {
policyID,
transactionID,
moneyRequestPreviewReportActionID,
moneyRequestReportID,
moneyRequestCreatedReportActionID,
actionableWhisperReportActionID,
...trackedExpenseInformation,
...transactionParams,
modifiedExpenseReportActionID,
reportPreviewReportActionID,
amount,
currency,
comment,
merchant,
category,
tag,
taxCode,
taxAmount,
billable,
created,
receipt,
policyExpenseChatReportID: createdWorkspaceParams?.expenseChatReportID,
policyExpenseCreatedReportActionID: createdWorkspaceParams?.expenseCreatedReportActionID,
adminsChatReportID: createdWorkspaceParams?.adminsChatReportID,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3891,32 +3889,35 @@ function trackExpense(
if (!linkedTrackedExpenseReportAction || !actionableWhisperReportActionID || !linkedTrackedExpenseReportID) {
return;
}
categorizeTrackedExpense(
chatReport?.policyID ?? '-1',
transaction?.transactionID ?? '-1',
iouAction?.reportActionID ?? '-1',
iouReport?.reportID ?? '-1',
createdIOUReportActionID ?? '-1',
const trackedExpenseInformation = {
policyID: chatReport?.policyID ?? '-1',
transactionID: transaction?.transactionID ?? '-1',
moneyRequestPreviewReportActionID: iouAction?.reportActionID ?? '-1',
moneyRequestReportID: iouReport?.reportID ?? '-1',
moneyRequestCreatedReportActionID: createdIOUReportActionID ?? '-1',
actionableWhisperReportActionID,
linkedTrackedExpenseReportAction,
linkedTrackedExpenseReportID,
transactionThreadReportID ?? '-1',
reportPreviewAction?.reportActionID ?? '-1',
transactionThreadReportID: transactionThreadReportID ?? '-1',
reportPreviewReportActionID: reportPreviewAction?.reportActionID ?? '-1',
onyxData,
isDraftPolicy,
} as CategorizeTrackedExpenseInformation;

const transactionParams = {
amount,
currency,
comment,
merchant,
created,
isDraftPolicy,
category,
tag,
taxCode,
taxAmount,
category,
tag,
billable,
trackedReceipt,
createdWorkspaceParams,
);
receipt: trackedReceipt,
} as CategorizeTrackedExpenseTransactionParams;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need type assertion here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing it...

categorizeTrackedExpense(trackedExpenseInformation, transactionParams, createdWorkspaceParams);
break;
}
case CONST.IOU.ACTION.SHARE: {
Expand Down
Loading