-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix - Room - Workspace the current user is not member appears in workspace list during room creation flow #53630
Merged
cristipaval
merged 2 commits into
Expensify:main
from
FitseTLT:fix-showing-workspace-current-user-is-not-member
Dec 16, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please don't modify this function. Instead use
shouldShowPolicy
. Maybe implement function likegetActiveAdminWorkspaces
to get filtered workspace.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why? I have checked all instances where we have used
getActivePolicies
and additional check of roles is already the requirement.shouldShowPolicy
is not the correct choice because it returns pending delete policies when offline. There is no way a policy where the current user has no role can be considered an active policy and updating getActivePolicies will avoid similar bugs in the future too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change
shouldShowPolicy
to include logic fromgetActivePolicies
and remove thegetActivePolicies
function altogether then.True, but we can control this via parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see the advantage of doing that:
getActivePolicies
accepts policies list and returns only policies that are active whileshouldShowPolicy
determines whether the policy should be shown or not (which allows pending delete policy when offline) and using additional param to use it for other purpose doesn't look like better approach to me a function should ideally serve one functionality.@cristipaval WDYT about the above discussion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is important to maintain the single responsibility principle for the functions. So yes, I think your suggestion makes sense, @FitseTLT. On the other hand, I think the function name might be a bit confusing, and I can see @shubham1206agra's concern. Maybe we could update the function doc and mention that we also filter based on the role since the users can have in Onyx policies that they are not members of.