-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Strong Motion Azimuth Deployment Guide/Doc #1967
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a good documentation, thanks @CBurton90 👍 A similar one for the structural arrays would surely be very handy for our data users.
The content is all good for me, I am just thinking if citing sensor examples for FBA/MEMS would be useful info (although not really relevant with azimuth)?
Following on from what Muriel states, it may simply not be needed to say FBA/MEMS and just say it applies to all SM sensors outside of structural arrays |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @CBurton90 this one looks really great and incredibly useful!!
I have added some very minor comments, take it or leave it as you see fit!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me
Kia Ora |
@salichon I just need to tidy up the question here then yes. Will put it on my list today, thanks for the reminder. |
@salichon Is this a question? Yes for case 2 the field tech will measure true north outside of the enclosure/infrastructure and compare instrument alignment from that (to obtain the sensor/recorder alignment within the space constrained enclosure). |
@staylorofford @mnaguit I've removed any mention of FBA/MEMS. Thanks. |
No description provided.