-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: update fge bias for EY2M #2042
Conversation
Appears the offsets were in the wrong order, i.e. xyz -> zyx
Hi @ozym - the title says EYRM, but from what you mentioned before issue with the offsets is in the EY2M data?? |
good catch, have updated title. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
once metadata have been updated, the change should be "deployed to tilde" and data potentially reprocessed before that to be visible on the plots? |
this doesn't get "deployed" to tilde. |
I just wanted to point out a quick way to check if calibration is correct. Both instruments should record the same magnetic field |
ha ha cool, all good and thanks for the tip! |
Appears the offsets were in the wrong order, i.e. xyz -> zyx
Tested and the values come much closer, and the two sets at West Melton look closer in offsets as well.