rubocop/lines: prefer assert_path_exists
and refute_path_exists
#19313
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
brew style
with your changes locally?brew typecheck
with your changes locally?brew tests
with your changes locally?In recent homebrew-core PRs, we've been asking contributors to use
assert_path_exists
andrefute_path_exists
instead ofassert_predicate <path>, :exist?
andrefute_predicate <path>, :exist?
respectively. See for example: Homebrew/homebrew-core#207806 (comment), Homebrew/homebrew-core#206960 (comment), Homebrew/homebrew-core#199951, etc.This PR makes this suggestion an autocorrectable rubocop (in some cases). Here's an example:
And here's the diff:
Note: I'll open a homebrew-core PR to update affected formulae if this PR makes sense. Tests currently fail because this potential PR has not been created and merged (branch: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/tree/assert-path-rubocop).