flutter 1.9.1

[mofneko]

• brew cask audit --download {{cask_file}} is error-free.
• brew cask style --fix {{cask_file}} reports no offenses.
• The commit message includes the cask’s name and version.
• Named the cask according to the [token reference].
• brew cask install {{cask_file}} worked successfully.
• brew cask uninstall {{cask_file}} worked successfully.
• Checked there are no [open pull requests] for the same cask.
• Checked the cask was not [already refused].
• Checked the cask is submitted to [the correct repo].

[vitorgalvao]

Welcome, @mofneko.

In the future, please don’t change the structure of the template, it’s helpful.

• Checked the cask was not already refused.

It was already refused and you know it. Please don’t check the box if it isn’t true, explain it instead (the template tells you as much, at the top). That was confusing and took me a while to figure out.

Still refusing because it should be a formula that builds from source.

[anton-matosov]

from here https://flutter.dev/docs/get-started/install/macos#run-flutter-doctor
Is that the reason why flutter is not built from source and pre-built binaries are used?

[vitorgalvao]

@anton-matosov I don’t see how that would be relevant. Homebrew isn’t compiled and also uses Google Analytics.

[cweagans]

I looked into building flutter from source for Homebrew, and it's really painful. Building it by hand is kind of a PITA. Automating it is even more so. Can we revisit this?

[anton-matosov]

@vitorgalvao just checking if analytics has anything to do with it.