Use "extension" instead of "format" in naming conventions #331
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…er documentation/word-of-mouth
greglucas
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2024
laspsandoval
pushed a commit
to laspsandoval/imap_processing
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2024
…ming-conventions-use-extension Use "extension" instead of "format" in naming conventions
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change Summary
Overview
This PR updates the naming conventions docs to use the word "extension" instead of "format" to describe the file extension. This is more consistent with how we describe this verbally amongst our team and in other forms of documentation.
Updated Files
docs/source/development-guide/style-guide/naming-conventions.rst