Solr 8.8 upgrade - remaining issues with solrconfig.xml

[poikilotherm]

Mistake

Since we upgraded from Solr 7.3.0, we made one bad mistake (mea culpa, too): we did not adapt the luceneMatchVersion to the version of the running server.

Other changes

We also did not incorporate upstream changes to solrconfig.xml:

--- solrconfig.xml	2021-03-08 10:29:37.810488567 +0100
+++ solrconfig-881.xml	2021-02-12 19:56:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
        that you fully re-index after changing this setting as it can
        affect both how text is indexed and queried.
   -->
-  <luceneMatchVersion>7.3.0</luceneMatchVersion>
+  <luceneMatchVersion>8.8.1</luceneMatchVersion>
 
   <!-- <lib/> directives can be used to instruct Solr to load any Jars
        identified and use them to resolve any "plugins" specified in
@@ -69,20 +69,11 @@
        If a 'dir' option (with or without a regex) is used and nothing
        is found that matches, a warning will be logged.

The formerly present JARs have been excluded since 8.0, see apache/lucene-solr@dce36c1

I don't know if we actually use any of those. Remove and look if it breaks.

-       The examples below can be used to load some solr-contribs along
+       The example below can be used to load a solr-contrib along
        with their external dependencies.
     -->
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/contrib/extraction/lib" regex=".*\.jar" />
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/dist/" regex="solr-cell-\d.*\.jar" />
+    <!-- <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/dist/" regex="solr-ltr-\d.*\.jar" /> -->
 
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/contrib/clustering/lib/" regex=".*\.jar" />
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/dist/" regex="solr-clustering-\d.*\.jar" />
-
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/contrib/langid/lib/" regex=".*\.jar" />
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/dist/" regex="solr-langid-\d.*\.jar" />
-
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/contrib/velocity/lib" regex=".*\.jar" />
-  <lib dir="${solr.install.dir:../../../..}/dist/" regex="solr-velocity-\d.*\.jar" />
   <!-- an exact 'path' can be used instead of a 'dir' to specify a
        specific jar file.  This will cause a serious error to be logged
        if it can't be loaded.

These are newer changes we should incorporate.

@@ -161,6 +152,15 @@
     <!-- <ramBufferSizeMB>100</ramBufferSizeMB> -->
     <!-- <maxBufferedDocs>1000</maxBufferedDocs> -->
 
+    <!-- Expert: ramPerThreadHardLimitMB sets the maximum amount of RAM that can be consumed
+         per thread before they are flushed. When limit is exceeded, this triggers a forced
+         flush even if ramBufferSizeMB has not been exceeded.
+         This is a safety limit to prevent Lucene's DocumentsWriterPerThread from address space
+         exhaustion due to its internal 32 bit signed integer based memory addressing.
+         The specified value should be greater than 0 and less than 2048MB. When not specified,
+         Solr uses Lucene's default value 1945. -->
+    <!-- <ramPerThreadHardLimitMB>1945</ramPerThreadHardLimitMB> -->
+
     <!-- Expert: Merge Policy
          The Merge Policy in Lucene controls how merging of segments is done.
          The default since Solr/Lucene 3.3 is TieredMergePolicy.
@@ -367,23 +367,32 @@
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
   <query>
 
-    <!-- Maximum number of clauses in each BooleanQuery,  an exception
-         is thrown if exceeded.  It is safe to increase or remove this setting,
-         since it is purely an arbitrary limit to try and catch user errors where
-         large boolean queries may not be the best implementation choice.
+    <!-- Maximum number of clauses allowed when parsing a boolean query string.
+         
+         This limit only impacts boolean queries specified by a user as part of a query string,
+         and provides per-collection controls on how complex user specified boolean queries can
+         be.  Query strings that specify more clauses then this will result in an error.
+         
+         If this per-collection limit is greater then the global `maxBooleanClauses` limit
+         specified in `solr.xml`, it will have no effect, as that setting also limits the size
+         of user specified boolean queries.
       -->
-    <maxBooleanClauses>1024</maxBooleanClauses>
+    <maxBooleanClauses>${solr.max.booleanClauses:1024}</maxBooleanClauses>
 
     <!-- Solr Internal Query Caches
 
-         There are two implementations of cache available for Solr,
-         LRUCache, based on a synchronized LinkedHashMap, and
-         FastLRUCache, based on a ConcurrentHashMap.
+         There are four implementations of cache available for Solr:
+         LRUCache, based on a synchronized LinkedHashMap, 
+         LFUCache and FastLRUCache, based on a ConcurrentHashMap, and CaffeineCache -
+         a modern and robust cache implementation. Note that in Solr 9.0
+         only CaffeineCache will be available, other implementations are now
+         deprecated.
 
          FastLRUCache has faster gets and slower puts in single
          threaded operation and thus is generally faster than LRUCache
          when the hit ratio of the cache is high (> 75%), and may be
          faster under other scenarios on multi-cpu systems.
+         Starting with Solr 9.0 the default cache implementation used is CaffeineCache.
     -->
 
     <!-- Filter Cache
@@ -403,13 +412,12 @@
            initialSize - the initial capacity (number of entries) of
                the cache.  (see java.util.HashMap)
            autowarmCount - the number of entries to prepopulate from
-               and old cache.
+               an old cache.
            maxRamMB - the maximum amount of RAM (in MB) that this cache is allowed
                       to occupy. Note that when this option is specified, the size
                       and initialSize parameters are ignored.
       -->
-    <filterCache class="solr.FastLRUCache"
-                 size="512"
+    <filterCache size="512"
                  initialSize="512"
                  autowarmCount="0"/>
 
@@ -421,8 +429,7 @@
             maxRamMB - the maximum amount of RAM (in MB) that this cache is allowed
                        to occupy
       -->
-    <queryResultCache class="solr.LRUCache"
-                      size="512"
+    <queryResultCache size="512"
                       initialSize="512"
                       autowarmCount="0"/>
 
@@ -432,14 +439,12 @@
          document).  Since Lucene internal document ids are transient,
          this cache will not be autowarmed.
       -->
-    <documentCache class="solr.LRUCache"
-                   size="512"
+    <documentCache size="512"
                    initialSize="512"
                    autowarmCount="0"/>
 
     <!-- custom cache currently used by block join -->
     <cache name="perSegFilter"
-           class="solr.search.LRUCache"
            size="10"
            initialSize="0"
            autowarmCount="10"
@@ -452,8 +457,7 @@
          even if not configured here.
       -->
     <!--
-       <fieldValueCache class="solr.FastLRUCache"
-                        size="512"
+       <fieldValueCache size="512"
                         autowarmCount="128"
                         showItems="32" />
       -->
@@ -469,7 +473,6 @@
       -->
     <!--
        <cache name="myUserCache"
-              class="solr.LRUCache"
               size="4096"
               initialSize="1024"
               autowarmCount="1024"
@@ -521,6 +524,23 @@
       -->
     <queryResultMaxDocsCached>200</queryResultMaxDocsCached>
 
+  <!-- Use Filter For Sorted Query
+
+   A possible optimization that attempts to use a filter to
+   satisfy a search.  If the requested sort does not include
+   score, then the filterCache will be checked for a filter
+   matching the query. If found, the filter will be used as the
+   source of document ids, and then the sort will be applied to
+   that.
+
+   For most situations, this will not be useful unless you
+   frequently get the same search repeatedly with different sort
+   options, and none of them ever use "score"
+-->
+    <!--
+       <useFilterForSortedQuery>true</useFilterForSortedQuery>
+      -->
+
     <!-- Query Related Event Listeners
 
          Various IndexSearcher related events can trigger Listeners to
@@ -569,6 +589,64 @@
 
   </query>
 
+  <!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+     Circuit Breaker Section - This section consists of configurations for
+     circuit breakers
+     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
+
+    <!-- Circuit Breakers
+
+     Circuit breakers are designed to allow stability and predictable query
+     execution. They prevent operations that can take down the node and cause
+     noisy neighbour issues.
+
+     This flag is the uber control switch which controls the activation/deactivation of all circuit
+     breakers. If a circuit breaker wishes to be independently configurable,
+     they are free to add their specific configuration but need to ensure that this flag is always
+     respected - this should have veto over all independent configuration flags.
+    -->
+    <circuitBreakers enabled="true">
+
+    <!-- Memory Circuit Breaker Configuration
+
+     Specific configuration for max JVM heap usage circuit breaker. This configuration defines whether
+     the circuit breaker is enabled and the threshold percentage of maximum heap allocated beyond which queries will be rejected until the
+     current JVM usage goes below the threshold. The valid value range for this value is 50-95.
+
+     Consider a scenario where the max heap allocated is 4 GB and memoryCircuitBreakerThreshold is
+     defined as 75. Threshold JVM usage will be 4 * 0.75 = 3 GB. Its generally a good idea to keep this value between 75 - 80% of maximum heap
+     allocated.
+
+     If, at any point, the current JVM heap usage goes above 3 GB, queries will be rejected until the heap usage goes below 3 GB again.
+     If you see queries getting rejected with 503 error code, check for "Circuit Breakers tripped"
+     in logs and the corresponding error message should tell you what transpired (if the failure
+     was caused by tripped circuit breakers).
+
+     If, at any point, the current JVM heap usage goes above 3 GB, queries will be rejected until the heap usage goes below 3 GB again.
+     If you see queries getting rejected with 503 error code, check for "Circuit Breakers tripped"
+     in logs and the corresponding error message should tell you what transpired (if the failure
+     was caused by tripped circuit breakers).
+    -->
+    <!--
+   <memBreaker enabled="true" threshold="75"/>
+    -->
+
+      <!-- CPU Circuit Breaker Configuration
+
+     Specific configuration for CPU utilization based circuit breaker. This configuration defines whether the circuit breaker is enabled
+     and the average load over the last minute at which the circuit breaker should start rejecting queries.
+
+     Consider a scenario where the max heap allocated is 4 GB and memoryCircuitBreakerThreshold is
+     defined as 75. Threshold JVM usage will be 4 * 0.75 = 3 GB. Its generally a good idea to keep this value between 75 - 80% of maximum heap
+     allocated.
+    -->
+
+      <!--
+       <cpuBreaker enabled="true" threshold="75"/>
+      -->
+
+  </circuitBreakers>
+
 
   <!-- Request Dispatcher

These are definitly changes we did. I don't know why they happened (it's really tricky to find its sources) and I don't know if this is actually used.

@@ -693,48 +771,6 @@
     <lst name="defaults">
       <str name="echoParams">explicit</str>
       <int name="rows">10</int>
-      <str name="defType">edismax</str>
-      <float name="tie">0.075</float>
-        <str name="qf">
-            dvName^400
-            authorName^180
-            dvSubject^190
-            dvDescription^180
-            dvAffiliation^170
-            title^130
-            subject^120
-            keyword^110
-            topicClassValue^100
-            dsDescriptionValue^90
-            authorAffiliation^80
-            publicationCitation^60
-            producerName^50
-            fileName^30
-            fileDescription^30
-            variableLabel^20
-            variableName^10
-            _text_^1.0
-        </str>
-        <str name="pf">
-            dvName^200
-            authorName^100
-            dvSubject^100
-            dvDescription^100
-            dvAffiliation^100
-            title^75
-            subject^75
-            keyword^75
-            topicClassValue^75
-            dsDescriptionValue^75
-            authorAffiliation^75
-            publicationCitation^75
-            producerName^75
-        </str>
-        <!-- Even though this number is huge it only seems to apply a boost of ~1.5x to final result -MAD 4.9.3--> 
-        <str name="bq">
-            isHarvested:false^25000
-        </str>
-
       <!-- Default search field
          <str name="df">text</str> 
         -->
@@ -805,43 +841,12 @@
     </lst>
   </requestHandler>

More changes by upstream, should be incorporated. (Seems related to the same change in apache/lucene-solr@dce36c1)

-
-  <!-- A Robust Example
-
-       This example SearchHandler declaration shows off usage of the
-       SearchHandler with many defaults declared
-
-       Note that multiple instances of the same Request Handler
-       (SearchHandler) can be registered multiple times with different
-       names (and different init parameters)
-    -->
-  <requestHandler name="/browse" class="solr.SearchHandler" useParams="query,facets,velocity,browse">
-    <lst name="defaults">
-      <str name="echoParams">explicit</str>
-    </lst>
-  </requestHandler>
-
-  <initParams path="/update/**,/query,/select,/tvrh,/elevate,/spell,/browse">
+  <initParams path="/update/**,/query,/select,/spell">
     <lst name="defaults">
       <str name="df">_text_</str>
     </lst>
   </initParams>
 
-  <!-- Solr Cell Update Request Handler
-
-       http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
-
-    -->
-  <requestHandler name="/update/extract"
-                  startup="lazy"
-                  class="solr.extraction.ExtractingRequestHandler" >
-    <lst name="defaults">
-      <str name="lowernames">true</str>
-      <str name="fmap.meta">ignored_</str>
-      <str name="fmap.content">_text_</str>
-    </lst>
-  </requestHandler>
-
   <!-- Search Components
 
        Search components are registered to SolrCore and used by
@@ -972,30 +977,6 @@
     </arr>
   </requestHandler>
 
-  <!-- Term Vector Component
-
-       http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermVectorComponent
-    -->
-  <searchComponent name="tvComponent" class="solr.TermVectorComponent"/>
-
-  <!-- A request handler for demonstrating the term vector component
-
-       This is purely as an example.
-
-       In reality you will likely want to add the component to your
-       already specified request handlers.
-    -->
-  <requestHandler name="/tvrh" class="solr.SearchHandler" startup="lazy">
-    <lst name="defaults">
-      <bool name="tv">true</bool>
-    </lst>
-    <arr name="last-components">
-      <str>tvComponent</str>
-    </arr>
-  </requestHandler>
-
-  <!-- Clustering Component. (Omitted here. See the default Solr example for a typical configuration.) -->
-
   <!-- Terms Component
 
        http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
@@ -1016,30 +997,6 @@
     </arr>
   </requestHandler>
 
-
-  <!-- Query Elevation Component
-
-       http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent
-
-       a search component that enables you to configure the top
-       results for a given query regardless of the normal lucene
-       scoring.
-    -->
-  <searchComponent name="elevator" class="solr.QueryElevationComponent" >
-    <!-- pick a fieldType to analyze queries -->
-    <str name="queryFieldType">string</str>
-  </searchComponent>
-
-  <!-- A request handler for demonstrating the elevator component -->
-  <requestHandler name="/elevate" class="solr.SearchHandler" startup="lazy">
-    <lst name="defaults">
-      <str name="echoParams">explicit</str>
-    </lst>
-    <arr name="last-components">
-      <str>elevator</str>
-    </arr>
-  </requestHandler>
-
   <!-- Highlighting Component
 
        http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters

🚨 THIS IS CRUCIAL FOR US. Newer versions of Solr default to the managed schema factory that @pkiraly suggested in #5989.

@@ -1170,8 +1127,6 @@
 
        See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/GuessingFieldTypes
     -->
-<schemaFactory class="ClassicIndexSchemaFactory"/>
-
   <updateProcessor class="solr.UUIDUpdateProcessorFactory" name="uuid"/>
   <updateProcessor class="solr.RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" name="remove-blank"/>
   <updateProcessor class="solr.FieldNameMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory" name="field-name-mutating">

These have been changed by upstream and as they seem to use regexes now, should be OK to incorporate.

@@ -1183,28 +1138,16 @@
   <updateProcessor class="solr.ParseDoubleFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" name="parse-double"/>
   <updateProcessor class="solr.ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory" name="parse-date">
     <arr name="format">
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSSZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss,SSS</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ssZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mmZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSSZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSSZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss,SSS</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ssZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mmZ</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm</str>
-      <str>yyyy-MM-dd</str>
+      <str>yyyy-MM-dd['T'[HH:mm[:ss[.SSS]][z</str>
+      <str>yyyy-MM-dd['T'[HH:mm[:ss[,SSS]][z</str>
+      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm[:ss[.SSS]][z</str>
+      <str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm[:ss[,SSS]][z</str>
+      <str>[EEE, ]dd MMM yyyy HH:mm[:ss] z</str>
+      <str>EEEE, dd-MMM-yy HH:mm:ss z</str>
+      <str>EEE MMM ppd HH:mm:ss [z ]yyyy</str>
     </arr>
   </updateProcessor>

Is the removal of this processors still a thing?

-
-  <!--Dataverse removed-->
-<!--  <updateProcessor class="solr.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory" name="add-schema-fields">
+  <updateProcessor class="solr.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessorFactory" name="add-schema-fields">
     <lst name="typeMapping">
       <str name="valueClass">java.lang.String</str>
       <str name="fieldType">text_general</str>
@@ -1212,7 +1155,7 @@
         <str name="dest">*_str</str>
         <int name="maxChars">256</int>
       </lst>
-
+      <!-- Use as default mapping instead of defaultFieldType -->
       <bool name="default">true</bool>
     </lst>
     <lst name="typeMapping">
@@ -1232,11 +1175,11 @@
       <str name="valueClass">java.lang.Number</str>
       <str name="fieldType">pdoubles</str>
     </lst>
-    </updateProcessor> -->
+  </updateProcessor>

We should us the setting to disable this instead of changing the default... 🙈

   <!-- The update.autoCreateFields property can be turned to false to disable schemaless mode -->
-  <updateRequestProcessorChain name="add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" default="${update.autoCreateFields:false}"
-           processor="uuid,remove-blank,field-name-mutating,parse-boolean,parse-long,parse-double,parse-date">
+  <updateRequestProcessorChain name="add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema" default="${update.autoCreateFields:true}"
+           processor="uuid,remove-blank,field-name-mutating,parse-boolean,parse-long,parse-double,parse-date,add-schema-fields">
     <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory"/>
     <processor class="solr.DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory"/>
     <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory"/>
@@ -1265,46 +1208,6 @@
      </updateRequestProcessorChain>
     -->

More upstream due to the libs removed. Looks like we never configured those.

-  <!-- Language identification
-
-       This example update chain identifies the language of the incoming
-       documents using the langid contrib. The detected language is
-       written to field language_s. No field name mapping is done.
-       The fields used for detection are text, title, subject and description,
-       making this example suitable for detecting languages form full-text
-       rich documents injected via ExtractingRequestHandler.
-       See more about langId at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageDetection
-    -->
-  <!--
-   <updateRequestProcessorChain name="langid">
-     <processor class="org.apache.solr.update.processor.TikaLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessorFactory">
-       <str name="langid.fl">text,title,subject,description</str>
-       <str name="langid.langField">language_s</str>
-       <str name="langid.fallback">en</str>
-     </processor>
-     <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
-     <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
-   </updateRequestProcessorChain>
-  -->
-
-  <!-- Script update processor
-
-    This example hooks in an update processor implemented using JavaScript.
-
-    See more about the script update processor at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ScriptUpdateProcessor
-  -->
-  <!--
-    <updateRequestProcessorChain name="script">
-      <processor class="solr.StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory">
-        <str name="script">update-script.js</str>
-        <lst name="params">
-          <str name="config_param">example config parameter</str>
-        </lst>
-      </processor>
-      <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
-    </updateRequestProcessorChain>
-  -->
-
   <!-- Response Writers
 
        http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryResponseWriter
@@ -1340,23 +1243,6 @@
     <str name="content-type">text/plain; charset=UTF-8</str>
   </queryResponseWriter>
 
-  <!--
-     Custom response writers can be declared as needed...
-    -->
-  <queryResponseWriter name="velocity" class="solr.VelocityResponseWriter" startup="lazy">
-    <str name="template.base.dir">${velocity.template.base.dir:}</str>
-    <str name="solr.resource.loader.enabled">${velocity.solr.resource.loader.enabled:true}</str>
-    <str name="params.resource.loader.enabled">${velocity.params.resource.loader.enabled:false}</str>
-  </queryResponseWriter>
-
-  <!-- XSLT response writer transforms the XML output by any xslt file found
-       in Solr's conf/xslt directory.  Changes to xslt files are checked for
-       every xsltCacheLifetimeSeconds.
-    -->
-  <queryResponseWriter name="xslt" class="solr.XSLTResponseWriter">
-    <int name="xsltCacheLifetimeSeconds">5</int>
-  </queryResponseWriter>
-
   <!-- Query Parsers
 
        https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/query-syntax-and-parsing.html

Conclusion

Instead of maintaining a static config, we should rely on using the _default configset and apply our changes to it.
At least this is what I'm going to do in the Dataverse Solr container images.

[poikilotherm]

Triggering @qqmyers @mheppler @scolapasta @pdurbin @sekmiller here.

[mheppler]

Noted, @poikilotherm. Thank you for catching this, opening an issue and providing all the details. Was already coordinating with @qqmyers and @scolapasta on #7378, and I'll add this new issue to my agenda as well.

Might be worth scheduling another tech hour discussion tomorrow, if there are any questions.

[poikilotherm]

I also looked around for upstream changes to schema.xml. There are some changes and maybe we should discuss those, too. (Deprecation of TrieXXXField, some language stuff)

[pdurbin]

@poikilotherm first of all, thanks for creating this issue.

Instead of maintaining a static config, we should rely on using the _default configset and apply our changes to it.

This sounds good but I'm not sure how it would work technically. As a starting point, it probably makes sense to list "our changes" so that we're all on the same page. We know we want "boosting" for example (see #1928 (comment) ) but I'm sure there are other tweaks we've made that I'm not thinking of. My guess is that we make fewer than half a dozen changes to the Solr config. Perhaps we should start by listing them in the dev guide so that when we do upgrades developers are aware of them.

[gksachin04]

After upgrading from SOLR 8.2 to SOLR 8.8.2 LTR response has degraded by 35%. Please find LTR specific details.

QUERY_DOC_FV

Let me know is there anything needs. to added

[pdurbin]

@gksachin04 in PR #8415 we already upgraded to Solr 8.11. If you're still having a problem with that version, can you please open a fresh issue? Thanks. And yes, more details would be great. 😄

[gksachin04]

@pdurbin Thanks, do you have LTR specific configuration in Solr 8.11 ?

[pdurbin]

@gksachin04 sorry, I don't. You might want to ask the community about it: https://groups.google.com/g/dataverse-community