Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flaky CQL test: testReindexingForEdgeIndex #3142

Open
FlorianHockmann opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Flaky CQL test: testReindexingForEdgeIndex #3142

FlorianHockmann opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@FlorianHockmann
Copy link
Member

Flaky Test

Stack Trace

The error is:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Update action [ENABLE_INDEX] cannot be invoked for index with status [INSTALLED]

and there are several stack traces like this one logged just before:

org.janusgraph.core.JanusGraphException: Could not commit transaction due to exception during persistence
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.transaction.StandardJanusGraphTx.commit(StandardJanusGraphTx.java:1538)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.JanusGraphTest$4.run(JanusGraphTest.java:3192)
Caused by: org.janusgraph.diskstorage.locking.PermanentLockingException: Local lock contention
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.locking.AbstractLocker.writeLock(AbstractLocker.java:324)
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.locking.consistentkey.ExpectedValueCheckingStore.acquireLock(ExpectedValueCheckingStore.java:102)
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.keycolumnvalue.KCVSProxy.acquireLock(KCVSProxy.java:52)
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.BackendTransaction.acquireIndexLock(BackendTransaction.java:258)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.database.StandardJanusGraph.prepareCommit(StandardJanusGraph.java:636)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.database.StandardJanusGraph.commit(StandardJanusGraph.java:776)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.transaction.StandardJanusGraphTx.commit(StandardJanusGraphTx.java:1527)
	... 1 more
org.janusgraph.core.JanusGraphException: Could not commit transaction due to exception during persistence
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.transaction.StandardJanusGraphTx.commit(StandardJanusGraphTx.java:1538)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.JanusGraphTest$4.run(JanusGraphTest.java:3192)
Caused by: org.janusgraph.diskstorage.locking.PermanentLockingException: Local lock contention
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.locking.AbstractLocker.writeLock(AbstractLocker.java:324)
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.locking.consistentkey.ExpectedValueCheckingStore.acquireLock(ExpectedValueCheckingStore.java:102)
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.keycolumnvalue.KCVSProxy.acquireLock(KCVSProxy.java:52)
	at org.janusgraph.diskstorage.BackendTransaction.acquireIndexLock(BackendTransaction.java:258)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.database.StandardJanusGraph.prepareCommit(StandardJanusGraph.java:636)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.database.StandardJanusGraph.commit(StandardJanusGraph.java:776)
	at org.janusgraph.graphdb.transaction.StandardJanusGraphTx.commit(StandardJanusGraphTx.java:1527)
	... 1 more
@FlorianHockmann
Copy link
Member Author

Also flaky for CQLGraphCacheTest:

Error:  Errors: 
Error:    CQLGraphCacheTest>JanusGraphTest.testReindexingForEdgeIndex:8778 » IllegalArgument Update action [ENABLE_INDEX] cannot be invoked for index with status [INSTALLED]

FlorianHockmann added a commit to GDATASoftwareAG/janusgraph that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* JanusGraph#1457
* JanusGraph#1459
* JanusGraph#1462
* JanusGraph#1464
* JanusGraph#1465
* JanusGraph#1497
* JanusGraph#2272
* JanusGraph#3142
* JanusGraph#3356
* JanusGraph#3392
* JanusGraph#3393
* JanusGraph#3651
* JanusGraph#3931
* JanusGraph#3959

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
FlorianHockmann added a commit to GDATASoftwareAG/janusgraph that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* JanusGraph#1457
* JanusGraph#1459
* JanusGraph#1462
* JanusGraph#1464
* JanusGraph#1465
* JanusGraph#1497
* JanusGraph#2272
* JanusGraph#3142
* JanusGraph#3356
* JanusGraph#3392
* JanusGraph#3393
* JanusGraph#3651
* JanusGraph#3931
* JanusGraph#3959
* JanusGraph#3960

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
FlorianHockmann added a commit to FlorianHockmann/janusgraph that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* JanusGraph#1457
* JanusGraph#1459
* JanusGraph#1462
* JanusGraph#1464
* JanusGraph#1465
* JanusGraph#1497
* JanusGraph#2272
* JanusGraph#3142
* JanusGraph#3356
* JanusGraph#3392
* JanusGraph#3393
* JanusGraph#3651
* JanusGraph#3931
* JanusGraph#3959
* JanusGraph#3960

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
FlorianHockmann added a commit to GDATASoftwareAG/janusgraph that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* JanusGraph#1457
* JanusGraph#1459
* JanusGraph#1462
* JanusGraph#1464
* JanusGraph#1465
* JanusGraph#1497
* JanusGraph#1498
* JanusGraph#2272
* JanusGraph#3142
* JanusGraph#3356
* JanusGraph#3392
* JanusGraph#3393
* JanusGraph#3651
* JanusGraph#3931
* JanusGraph#3959
* JanusGraph#3960

I went through the recent builds on `master` and checked all failed
builds. I think this should handle all flaky tests that occurred in
these builds, apart from the TinkerPop test where I just don't know how
to deal with it: JanusGraph#3841, but we can of course just address that in
another PR.
We however also sometimes get failed jobs because of some intermediate
issues where a backend cannot be properly set up or teared down for some
reason or downloading some artifact just fails. I don't know what we can
do to improve this, but I would also consider that out of scope of this
PR where I just wanted to deal with failing jobs due to specific tests
being flaky.

Hopefully, this will already lead to significantly fewer cases where we
have to manually restart failed jobs (which I had to do a lot lately for
all these Dependabot PRs).

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
FlorianHockmann added a commit to GDATASoftwareAG/janusgraph that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* JanusGraph#1457
* JanusGraph#1459
* JanusGraph#1462
* JanusGraph#1464
* JanusGraph#1465
* JanusGraph#1497
* JanusGraph#1498
* JanusGraph#2272
* JanusGraph#3142
* JanusGraph#3356
* JanusGraph#3392
* JanusGraph#3393
* JanusGraph#3651
* JanusGraph#3931
* JanusGraph#3959
* JanusGraph#3960

I went through the recent builds on `master` and checked all failed
builds. I think this should handle all flaky tests that occurred in
these builds, apart from the TinkerPop test where I just don't know how
to deal with it: JanusGraph#3841, but we can of course just address that in
another PR.
We however also sometimes get failed jobs because of some intermediate
issues where a backend cannot be properly set up or teared down for some
reason or downloading some artifact just fails. I don't know what we can
do to improve this, but I would also consider that out of scope of this
PR where I just wanted to deal with failing jobs due to specific tests
being flaky.

Hopefully, this will already lead to significantly fewer cases where we
have to manually restart failed jobs (which I had to do a lot lately for
all these Dependabot PRs).

I also added a link to the relevant issue to all flaky tests.

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
FlorianHockmann added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* #1457
* #1459
* #1462
* #1464
* #1465
* #1497
* #1498
* #2272
* #3142
* #3356
* #3392
* #3393
* #3651
* #3931
* #3959
* #3960

I went through the recent builds on `master` and checked all failed
builds. I think this should handle all flaky tests that occurred in
these builds, apart from the TinkerPop test where I just don't know how
to deal with it: #3841, but we can of course just address that in
another PR.
We however also sometimes get failed jobs because of some intermediate
issues where a backend cannot be properly set up or teared down for some
reason or downloading some artifact just fails. I don't know what we can
do to improve this, but I would also consider that out of scope of this
PR where I just wanted to deal with failing jobs due to specific tests
being flaky.

Hopefully, this will already lead to significantly fewer cases where we
have to manually restart failed jobs (which I had to do a lot lately for
all these Dependabot PRs).

I also added a link to the relevant issue to all flaky tests.

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
FlorianHockmann added a commit to FlorianHockmann/janusgraph that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* JanusGraph#1457
* JanusGraph#1459
* JanusGraph#1462
* JanusGraph#1464
* JanusGraph#1465
* JanusGraph#1497
* JanusGraph#1498
* JanusGraph#2272
* JanusGraph#3142
* JanusGraph#3356
* JanusGraph#3392
* JanusGraph#3393
* JanusGraph#3651
* JanusGraph#3931
* JanusGraph#3959
* JanusGraph#3960

I went through the recent builds on `master` and checked all failed
builds. I think this should handle all flaky tests that occurred in
these builds, apart from the TinkerPop test where I just don't know how
to deal with it: JanusGraph#3841, but we can of course just address that in
another PR.
We however also sometimes get failed jobs because of some intermediate
issues where a backend cannot be properly set up or teared down for some
reason or downloading some artifact just fails. I don't know what we can
do to improve this, but I would also consider that out of scope of this
PR where I just wanted to deal with failing jobs due to specific tests
being flaky.

Hopefully, this will already lead to significantly fewer cases where we
have to manually restart failed jobs (which I had to do a lot lately for
all these Dependabot PRs).

I also added a link to the relevant issue to all flaky tests.

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
(cherry picked from commit 2ba933c)

# Conflicts:
#	janusgraph-cql/src/test/java/org/janusgraph/graphdb/cql/CQLGraphTest.java
#	janusgraph-solr/src/test/java/org/janusgraph/diskstorage/solr/CQLSolrTest.java
#	janusgraph-test/src/test/java/org/janusgraph/diskstorage/cache/ExpirationCacheTest.java
FlorianHockmann added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2023
This adds the necessary annotation to repeat flaky tests if necessary
for tests described in these issues:
* #1457
* #1459
* #1462
* #1464
* #1465
* #1497
* #1498
* #2272
* #3142
* #3356
* #3392
* #3393
* #3651
* #3931
* #3959
* #3960

I went through the recent builds on `master` and checked all failed
builds. I think this should handle all flaky tests that occurred in
these builds, apart from the TinkerPop test where I just don't know how
to deal with it: #3841, but we can of course just address that in
another PR.
We however also sometimes get failed jobs because of some intermediate
issues where a backend cannot be properly set up or teared down for some
reason or downloading some artifact just fails. I don't know what we can
do to improve this, but I would also consider that out of scope of this
PR where I just wanted to deal with failing jobs due to specific tests
being flaky.

Hopefully, this will already lead to significantly fewer cases where we
have to manually restart failed jobs (which I had to do a lot lately for
all these Dependabot PRs).

I also added a link to the relevant issue to all flaky tests.

Signed-off-by: Florian Hockmann <fh@florian-hockmann.de>
(cherry picked from commit 2ba933c)

# Conflicts:
#	janusgraph-cql/src/test/java/org/janusgraph/graphdb/cql/CQLGraphTest.java
#	janusgraph-solr/src/test/java/org/janusgraph/diskstorage/solr/CQLSolrTest.java
#	janusgraph-test/src/test/java/org/janusgraph/diskstorage/cache/ExpirationCacheTest.java
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant