-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AWS API Definitions Updated #637
Conversation
fd68721
to
3266ffc
Compare
032cc9f
to
595dcd3
Compare
b9192b9
to
3cbba8a
Compare
e26bbbb
to
679ba6a
Compare
1e9fdd6
to
b613dcf
Compare
336477c
to
a52cd6b
Compare
a52cd6b
to
938f8a3
Compare
4ddb83a
to
18143d8
Compare
Could this be merged and tagged? I noticed that AWS.jl doesn't have all the newest actions anymore (like |
18143d8
to
7e5672f
Compare
There's a lot of history that's collapsed by default but of note are #637 (comment) and #637 (comment). I agree it'd be nice to have it merged. |
Ah, yea, I did not check if there were any comments there. For the formatting, I suggest we downgrade JuliaFormatter for the time being (#676). I think that should reduce the diff here. It does look like the new formatting of those function definitions better matches the generated code, so it feels like the new JuliaFormatter is doing the right thing here. AWS.jl/src/api_generation/high_level.jl Lines 153 to 179 in 5ebf8ca
But I think we could get the substantial changes here merged first, and then just do a trivial formatting PR afterwards. |
Yeah I suppose it does better match the way the generated code is written, but the change seems like a bug to me; IIUC, |
7e5672f
to
f515177
Compare
The diff here has been reduced very significantly thanks to @mortenpi; the remaining changes should now be reflective of actual AWS changes. @mattBrzezinski, given that the SQS change from |
2ad97a6
to
817f639
Compare
b5c29a8
to
1a5f283
Compare
1a5f283
to
cc67020
Compare
Sorry just seeing this now! I can take a pass over this, merge it and tag the new version. To be honest, I don't have the time day-to-day to work on OSS; nor a desire to spend my free time on it. I am happy to add folks to the organization if they would like to take some ownership over the package, and give an in-depth walkthrough of how it works if desired. |
Thanks, @mattBrzezinski!
Extremely relatable
It could be worth posting a call for maintainers on Discourse and perhaps link to that in the Julia Slack. |
Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action